TY - JOUR
T1 - The Future of Complementarity
T2 - Disentangling Causes from Consequences
AU - Barry, Kathryn E.
AU - Mommer, Liesje
AU - van Ruijven, Jasper
AU - Wirth, Christian
AU - Wright, Alexandra J.
AU - Bai, Yongfei
AU - Connolly, John
AU - De Deyn, Gerlinde B.
AU - de Kroon, Hans
AU - Isbell, Forest
AU - Milcu, Alexandru
AU - Roscher, Christiane
AU - Scherer-Lorenzen, Michael
AU - Schmid, Bernhard
AU - Weigelt, Alexandra
PY - 2019/2
Y1 - 2019/2
N2 - Evidence suggests that biodiversity supports ecosystem functioning. Yet, the mechanisms driving this relationship remain unclear. Complementarity is one common explanation for these positive biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships. Yet, complementarity is often indirectly quantified as overperformance in mixture relative to monoculture (e.g., ‘complementarity effect’). This overperformance is then attributed to the intuitive idea of complementarity or, more specifically, to species resource partitioning. Locally, however, several unassociated causes may drive this overperformance. Here, we differentiate complementarity into three types of species differences that may cause enhanced ecosystem functioning in more diverse ecosystems: (i) resource partitioning, (ii) abiotic facilitation, and (iii) biotic feedbacks. We argue that disentangling these three causes is crucial for predicting the response of ecosystems to future biodiversity loss.
AB - Evidence suggests that biodiversity supports ecosystem functioning. Yet, the mechanisms driving this relationship remain unclear. Complementarity is one common explanation for these positive biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships. Yet, complementarity is often indirectly quantified as overperformance in mixture relative to monoculture (e.g., ‘complementarity effect’). This overperformance is then attributed to the intuitive idea of complementarity or, more specifically, to species resource partitioning. Locally, however, several unassociated causes may drive this overperformance. Here, we differentiate complementarity into three types of species differences that may cause enhanced ecosystem functioning in more diverse ecosystems: (i) resource partitioning, (ii) abiotic facilitation, and (iii) biotic feedbacks. We argue that disentangling these three causes is crucial for predicting the response of ecosystems to future biodiversity loss.
KW - Abiotic facilitation
KW - Biodiversity
KW - Biotic feedbacks
KW - Complementarity
KW - Complementarity effect
KW - Ecosystem functioning
KW - Plant-soil feedback
KW - Resource partitioning
KW - Resource tracers
KW - Stress amelioration
U2 - 10.1016/j.tree.2018.10.013
DO - 10.1016/j.tree.2018.10.013
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85057819219
SN - 0169-5347
VL - 34
SP - 167
EP - 180
JO - Trends in Ecology and Evolution
JF - Trends in Ecology and Evolution
IS - 2
ER -