TY - JOUR
T1 - The fluid nature of water grabbing
T2 - the on-going contestation of water distribution between peasants and agribusinesses in Nduruma, Tanzania
AU - de Bont, Chris
AU - Veldwisch, Gert Jan
AU - Komakech, Hans Charles
AU - Vos, Jeroen
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - This article contributes to the contemporary debate on land and water grabbing through a detailed, qualitative case study of horticultural agribusinesses which have settled in Tanzania, disrupting patterns of land and water use. In this paper we analyse how capitalist settler farms and their upstream and downstream peasant neighbours along the Nduruma river, Tanzania, expand and defend their water use. The paper is based on 3 months of qualitative field work in Tanzania. We use the echelons of rights analysis framework combined with the concept of institutional bricolage to show how this contestation takes place over the full spectrum of actual abstractions, governance and discourses. We emphasise the role different (inter)national development narratives play in shaping day-to-day contestations over water shares and rule-making. Ultimately, we emphasise that water grabbing is not a one-time event, but rather an on-going struggle over different water resources. In addition, we show how a perceived beneficial development of agribusinesses switching to groundwater allows them to avoid peasant-controlled institutions, avoiding further negotiation between the different actors and improving their image among neighbouring communities. This development illustrates how complex and obscured processes of water re-allocation can be without becoming illegal per se.
AB - This article contributes to the contemporary debate on land and water grabbing through a detailed, qualitative case study of horticultural agribusinesses which have settled in Tanzania, disrupting patterns of land and water use. In this paper we analyse how capitalist settler farms and their upstream and downstream peasant neighbours along the Nduruma river, Tanzania, expand and defend their water use. The paper is based on 3 months of qualitative field work in Tanzania. We use the echelons of rights analysis framework combined with the concept of institutional bricolage to show how this contestation takes place over the full spectrum of actual abstractions, governance and discourses. We emphasise the role different (inter)national development narratives play in shaping day-to-day contestations over water shares and rule-making. Ultimately, we emphasise that water grabbing is not a one-time event, but rather an on-going struggle over different water resources. In addition, we show how a perceived beneficial development of agribusinesses switching to groundwater allows them to avoid peasant-controlled institutions, avoiding further negotiation between the different actors and improving their image among neighbouring communities. This development illustrates how complex and obscured processes of water re-allocation can be without becoming illegal per se.
KW - Echelons of rights analysis
KW - Foreign direct investment
KW - Institutional bricolage
KW - Smallholder irrigation
KW - Tanzania
KW - Water grabbing
U2 - 10.1007/s10460-015-9644-5
DO - 10.1007/s10460-015-9644-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84939637814
SN - 0889-048X
VL - 33
SP - 641
EP - 654
JO - Agriculture and Human Values
JF - Agriculture and Human Values
IS - 3
ER -