The European Union Court’s Advocate General’s Opinion and new plant breeding techniques

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
LanguageEnglish
Pages573-575
JournalNature Biotechnology
Volume36
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jul 2018

Cite this

@article{bfc24f5653a44fcc90cb20560d0db1be,
title = "The European Union Court’s Advocate General’s Opinion and new plant breeding techniques",
author = "K. Purnhagen and E.J. Kok and G.A. Kleter and H. Schebesta and R.G.F. Visser and J.H.H. Wesseler",
note = "Editor's note: This article has been peer-reviewed.",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1038/nbt.4174",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "573--575",
journal = "Nature Biotechnology",
issn = "1087-0156",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

The European Union Court’s Advocate General’s Opinion and new plant breeding techniques. / Purnhagen, K.; Kok, E.J.; Kleter, G.A.; Schebesta, H.; Visser, R.G.F.; Wesseler, J.H.H.

In: Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 36, No. 7, 06.07.2018, p. 573-575.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The European Union Court’s Advocate General’s Opinion and new plant breeding techniques

AU - Purnhagen, K.

AU - Kok, E.J.

AU - Kleter, G.A.

AU - Schebesta, H.

AU - Visser, R.G.F.

AU - Wesseler, J.H.H.

N1 - Editor's note: This article has been peer-reviewed.

PY - 2018/7/6

Y1 - 2018/7/6

U2 - 10.1038/nbt.4174

DO - 10.1038/nbt.4174

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

VL - 36

SP - 573

EP - 575

JO - Nature Biotechnology

T2 - Nature Biotechnology

JF - Nature Biotechnology

SN - 1087-0156

IS - 7

ER -