The European Commission's ability to deal with wicked problems: an in-depth case study of the governance of food security

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The European Commission's ability to cope with wicked problems is generally viewed as inadequate because of its hierarchical and inflexible modus operandi. Recent research suggests, however, that the Commission may be better equipped to deal with wicked problems than is commonly assumed. To elucidate these contradictory viewpoints, we analysed conditions that enable or constrain the Commission in dealing with wicked problems. To do so, we applied a framework consisting of five governance capabilities required to deal with wicked problems (reflexivity, responsiveness, resilience, revitalization and rescaling) to a case study of how the Commission deals with the wicked problem of food security. Although our results confirm some of the earlier critiques, we have also identified various enabling conditions, most notably inter-service and inter-institutional procedures and structures, boundary arrangements and a widespread tolerance of frame conflicts, uncertainty and cross-scale dynamics. However, the Commission lacks a mechanism to continuously monitor and adjust its capabilities, thereby running the risk of challenges remaining unforeseen and unanticipated.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)789-813
JournalJournal of European Public Policy
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

European Commission
governance
food
ability
reflexivity
resilience
tolerance
uncertainty
lack

Cite this

@article{d1bfa8c6626b4b44969ddd5beedf1b06,
title = "The European Commission's ability to deal with wicked problems: an in-depth case study of the governance of food security",
abstract = "The European Commission's ability to cope with wicked problems is generally viewed as inadequate because of its hierarchical and inflexible modus operandi. Recent research suggests, however, that the Commission may be better equipped to deal with wicked problems than is commonly assumed. To elucidate these contradictory viewpoints, we analysed conditions that enable or constrain the Commission in dealing with wicked problems. To do so, we applied a framework consisting of five governance capabilities required to deal with wicked problems (reflexivity, responsiveness, resilience, revitalization and rescaling) to a case study of how the Commission deals with the wicked problem of food security. Although our results confirm some of the earlier critiques, we have also identified various enabling conditions, most notably inter-service and inter-institutional procedures and structures, boundary arrangements and a widespread tolerance of frame conflicts, uncertainty and cross-scale dynamics. However, the Commission lacks a mechanism to continuously monitor and adjust its capabilities, thereby running the risk of challenges remaining unforeseen and unanticipated.",
author = "J.J.L. Candel and G.E. Breeman and C.J.A.M. Termeer",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/13501763.2015.1068836",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "789--813",
journal = "Journal of European Public Policy",
issn = "1350-1763",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "6",

}

The European Commission's ability to deal with wicked problems: an in-depth case study of the governance of food security. / Candel, J.J.L.; Breeman, G.E.; Termeer, C.J.A.M.

In: Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 23, No. 6, 2016, p. 789-813.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The European Commission's ability to deal with wicked problems: an in-depth case study of the governance of food security

AU - Candel, J.J.L.

AU - Breeman, G.E.

AU - Termeer, C.J.A.M.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The European Commission's ability to cope with wicked problems is generally viewed as inadequate because of its hierarchical and inflexible modus operandi. Recent research suggests, however, that the Commission may be better equipped to deal with wicked problems than is commonly assumed. To elucidate these contradictory viewpoints, we analysed conditions that enable or constrain the Commission in dealing with wicked problems. To do so, we applied a framework consisting of five governance capabilities required to deal with wicked problems (reflexivity, responsiveness, resilience, revitalization and rescaling) to a case study of how the Commission deals with the wicked problem of food security. Although our results confirm some of the earlier critiques, we have also identified various enabling conditions, most notably inter-service and inter-institutional procedures and structures, boundary arrangements and a widespread tolerance of frame conflicts, uncertainty and cross-scale dynamics. However, the Commission lacks a mechanism to continuously monitor and adjust its capabilities, thereby running the risk of challenges remaining unforeseen and unanticipated.

AB - The European Commission's ability to cope with wicked problems is generally viewed as inadequate because of its hierarchical and inflexible modus operandi. Recent research suggests, however, that the Commission may be better equipped to deal with wicked problems than is commonly assumed. To elucidate these contradictory viewpoints, we analysed conditions that enable or constrain the Commission in dealing with wicked problems. To do so, we applied a framework consisting of five governance capabilities required to deal with wicked problems (reflexivity, responsiveness, resilience, revitalization and rescaling) to a case study of how the Commission deals with the wicked problem of food security. Although our results confirm some of the earlier critiques, we have also identified various enabling conditions, most notably inter-service and inter-institutional procedures and structures, boundary arrangements and a widespread tolerance of frame conflicts, uncertainty and cross-scale dynamics. However, the Commission lacks a mechanism to continuously monitor and adjust its capabilities, thereby running the risk of challenges remaining unforeseen and unanticipated.

U2 - 10.1080/13501763.2015.1068836

DO - 10.1080/13501763.2015.1068836

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 789

EP - 813

JO - Journal of European Public Policy

JF - Journal of European Public Policy

SN - 1350-1763

IS - 6

ER -