Abstract
The potential for vaccines to prevent the spread of infectious diseases is crucial for vaccination policy and ethics. In this paper, I discuss recent evidence that the current COVID-19 vaccines have only a modest and short-lived effect on reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission and argue that this has at least four important ethical implications. First, getting vaccinated against COVID-19 should be seen primarily as a self-protective choice for individuals. Second, moral condemnation of unvaccinated people for causing direct harm to others is unjustified. Third, the case for a harm-based moral obligation to get vaccinated against COVID-19 is weak. Finally, and perhaps most significantly, coercive COVID-19 vaccination policies (e.g., measures that exclude unvaccinated people from society) cannot be directly justified by the harm principle.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 21-29 |
| Journal | Journal of Bioethical Inquiry |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 21 Dec 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Coercion
- COVID-19 vaccination
- Mandatory vaccination
- Public health ethics
- Vaccination policy
- Vaccine passports
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Ethical Significance of Post-Vaccination COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver