Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Ethical Significance of Post-Vaccination COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics

  • Steven R. Kraaijeveld*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The potential for vaccines to prevent the spread of infectious diseases is crucial for vaccination policy and ethics. In this paper, I discuss recent evidence that the current COVID-19 vaccines have only a modest and short-lived effect on reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission and argue that this has at least four important ethical implications. First, getting vaccinated against COVID-19 should be seen primarily as a self-protective choice for individuals. Second, moral condemnation of unvaccinated people for causing direct harm to others is unjustified. Third, the case for a harm-based moral obligation to get vaccinated against COVID-19 is weak. Finally, and perhaps most significantly, coercive COVID-19 vaccination policies (e.g., measures that exclude unvaccinated people from society) cannot be directly justified by the harm principle.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-29
JournalJournal of Bioethical Inquiry
Volume20
Issue number1
Early online date21 Dec 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Coercion
  • COVID-19 vaccination
  • Mandatory vaccination
  • Public health ethics
  • Vaccination policy
  • Vaccine passports

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Ethical Significance of Post-Vaccination COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this