TY - JOUR
T1 - The environmental flows implementation challenge
T2 - Insights and recommendations across water-limited systems
AU - Wineland, Sean M.
AU - Bașağaoğlu, Hakan
AU - Fleming, Jeri
AU - Friedman, Jack
AU - Garza-Diaz, Laura
AU - Kellogg, Wayne
AU - Koch, Jennifer
AU - Lane, Belize A.
AU - Mirchi, Ali
AU - Nava, Luzma F.
AU - Neeson, Thomas M.
AU - Ortiz-Partida, J.P.
AU - Paladino, Stephanie
AU - Plassin, Sophie
AU - Gomez-Quiroga, Grace
AU - Saiz-Rodriguez, Ramon
AU - Sandoval-Solis, Samuel
AU - Wagner, Kevin
AU - Weber, Newakis
AU - Winterle, James
AU - Wootten, Adrienne M.
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - Environmental flows (e-flows) are powerful tools for sustaining freshwater biodiversity and ecosystem services, but their widespread implementation faces numerous social, political, and economic barriers. These barriers are amplified in water-limited systems where strong trade-offs exist between human water needs and freshwater ecosystem protection. We synthesize the complex, multidisciplinary challenges that exist in these systems to help identify targeted solutions to accelerate the adoption and implementation of environmental flows initiatives. We present case studies from three water-limited systems in North America and synthesize the major barriers to implementing environmental flows. We identify four common barriers: (a) lack of authority to implement e-flows in water governance structures, (b) fragmented water governance in transboundary water systems, (c) declining water availability and increasing variability under climate change, and (d) lack of consideration of non-biophysical factors. We then formulate actionable recommendations for decision makers facing these barriers when working towards implementing environmental flows: (a) modify or establish a water governance framework to recognize or allow e-flows, (b) strive for collaboration across political jurisdictions and social, economic, and environmental sectors, and (c) manage adaptively for climate change in e-flows planning and recommendations. This article is categorized under: Water and Life > Conservation, Management, and Awareness Human Water > Water Governance Engineering Water > Planning Water.
AB - Environmental flows (e-flows) are powerful tools for sustaining freshwater biodiversity and ecosystem services, but their widespread implementation faces numerous social, political, and economic barriers. These barriers are amplified in water-limited systems where strong trade-offs exist between human water needs and freshwater ecosystem protection. We synthesize the complex, multidisciplinary challenges that exist in these systems to help identify targeted solutions to accelerate the adoption and implementation of environmental flows initiatives. We present case studies from three water-limited systems in North America and synthesize the major barriers to implementing environmental flows. We identify four common barriers: (a) lack of authority to implement e-flows in water governance structures, (b) fragmented water governance in transboundary water systems, (c) declining water availability and increasing variability under climate change, and (d) lack of consideration of non-biophysical factors. We then formulate actionable recommendations for decision makers facing these barriers when working towards implementing environmental flows: (a) modify or establish a water governance framework to recognize or allow e-flows, (b) strive for collaboration across political jurisdictions and social, economic, and environmental sectors, and (c) manage adaptively for climate change in e-flows planning and recommendations. This article is categorized under: Water and Life > Conservation, Management, and Awareness Human Water > Water Governance Engineering Water > Planning Water.
U2 - 10.1002/wat2.1565
DO - 10.1002/wat2.1565
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85118374275
SN - 2049-1948
VL - 9
JO - Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water
JF - Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water
IS - 1
M1 - e1565
ER -