TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects on public health of climate change adaptation responses
T2 - A systematic review of evidence from low- And middle-income countries
AU - Scheelbeek, Pauline F.D.
AU - Dangour, Alan D.
AU - Jarmul, Stephanie
AU - Turner, Grace
AU - Sietsma, Anne J.
AU - Minx, Jan C.
AU - Callaghan, Max
AU - Ajibade, Idowu
AU - Austin, Stephanie E.
AU - Biesbroek, Robbert
AU - Bowen, Kathryn J.
AU - Chen, Tara
AU - Davis, Katy
AU - Ensor, Tim
AU - Ford, James D.
AU - Galappaththi, Eranga K.
AU - Joe, Elphin T.
AU - Musah-Surugu, Issah J.
AU - Alverio, Gabriela Nagle
AU - Schwerdtle, Patricia Nayna
AU - Pokharel, Pratik
AU - Salubi, Eunice A.
AU - Scarpa, Giulia
AU - Segnon, Alcade C.
AU - Sia, Mariella
AU - Templeman, Sienna
AU - Xu, Jiren
AU - Zavaleta-Cortijo, Carol
AU - Berrang-Ford, Lea
PY - 2021/7/13
Y1 - 2021/7/13
N2 - Climate change adaptation responses are being developed and delivered in many parts of the world in the absence of detailed knowledge of their effects on public health. Here we present the results of a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature reporting the effects on health of climate change adaptation responses in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The review used the 'Global Adaptation Mapping Initiative' database (comprising 1682 publications related to climate change adaptation responses) that was constructed through systematic literature searches in Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar (2013-2020). For this study, further screening was performed to identify studies from LMICs reporting the effects on human health of climate change adaptation responses. Studies were categorised by study design and data were extracted on geographic region, population under investigation, type of adaptation response and reported health effects. The review identified 99 studies (1117 reported outcomes), reporting evidence from 66 LMICs. Only two studies were ex ante formal evaluations of climate change adaptation responses. Papers reported adaptation responses related to flooding, rainfall, drought and extreme heat, predominantly through behaviour change, and infrastructural and technological improvements. Reported (direct and intermediate) health outcomes included reduction in infectious disease incidence, improved access to water/sanitation and improved food security. All-cause mortality was rarely reported, and no papers were identified reporting on maternal and child health. Reported maladaptations were predominantly related to widening of inequalities and unforeseen co-harms. Reporting and publication-bias seems likely with only 3.5% of all 1117 health outcomes reported to be negative. Our review identified some evidence that climate change adaptation responses may have benefits for human health but the overall paucity of evidence is concerning and represents a major missed opportunity for learning. There is an urgent need for greater focus on the funding, design, evaluation and standardised reporting of the effects on health of climate change adaptation responses to enable evidence-based policy action.
AB - Climate change adaptation responses are being developed and delivered in many parts of the world in the absence of detailed knowledge of their effects on public health. Here we present the results of a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature reporting the effects on health of climate change adaptation responses in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The review used the 'Global Adaptation Mapping Initiative' database (comprising 1682 publications related to climate change adaptation responses) that was constructed through systematic literature searches in Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar (2013-2020). For this study, further screening was performed to identify studies from LMICs reporting the effects on human health of climate change adaptation responses. Studies were categorised by study design and data were extracted on geographic region, population under investigation, type of adaptation response and reported health effects. The review identified 99 studies (1117 reported outcomes), reporting evidence from 66 LMICs. Only two studies were ex ante formal evaluations of climate change adaptation responses. Papers reported adaptation responses related to flooding, rainfall, drought and extreme heat, predominantly through behaviour change, and infrastructural and technological improvements. Reported (direct and intermediate) health outcomes included reduction in infectious disease incidence, improved access to water/sanitation and improved food security. All-cause mortality was rarely reported, and no papers were identified reporting on maternal and child health. Reported maladaptations were predominantly related to widening of inequalities and unforeseen co-harms. Reporting and publication-bias seems likely with only 3.5% of all 1117 health outcomes reported to be negative. Our review identified some evidence that climate change adaptation responses may have benefits for human health but the overall paucity of evidence is concerning and represents a major missed opportunity for learning. There is an urgent need for greater focus on the funding, design, evaluation and standardised reporting of the effects on health of climate change adaptation responses to enable evidence-based policy action.
KW - climate change adaptation
KW - climate change adaptation response
KW - data synthesis
KW - low- and middle-income countries
KW - public health
KW - systematic review
U2 - 10.1088/1748-9326/ac092c
DO - 10.1088/1748-9326/ac092c
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85110973559
SN - 1748-9326
VL - 16
JO - Environmental Research Letters
JF - Environmental Research Letters
IS - 7
M1 - 073001
ER -