TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of fertilizer pretreatment on nitrogen cycling in an intensively managed temperate grassland
AU - Nyameasem, J.K.
AU - Taube, F.
AU - Kluß, C.
AU - Neumann, S.
AU - Reinsch, T.
PY - 2024/11/1
Y1 - 2024/11/1
N2 - Effective nitrogen (N) management is essential for minimizing fertilizer nutrient losses and maximizing N use efficiency. This study, conducted over two years on permanent grassland sites in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, explored the effects of urea treatment with a urease inhibitor and digestate acidification on N-cycling and yield performance in a temperate maritime grassland context. Micro plots within these grasslands received varying N rates via acidified (with sulphuric acid) or non-acidified digestate (biogas residues), urea treated with- or without urease inhibitor (N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide) or calcium ammonium nitrate. Parameters measured included dry and N matter accumulations, NH3 volatilization, N2O emissions, NO3--N leaching, methane (CH4), and total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from soils. The findings demonstrated that the acidified digestate consistently enhanced metabolizable energy (ME), N yields (up to 47 %) and the apparent N recovery (ANR). While the acidified digestate and treated urea concurrently reduced NH3 emissions, the treated urea did not significantly affect (p> 0.05) dry matter (DM) and N yields, ANR, or total GHG emissions. Thus, digestate acidification or urea N stabilization could effectively mitigate the environmental impact of forage grass production while maintaining higher or comparable yields. However, higher risks of pollution swapping to groundwater bodies may result from higher N input rates. Applying acidified digestate or stabilized urea N to grasslands at a 120 kg mineral N ha−1 rate offers a practical approach, yielding appreciable N and ME while minimizing N losses.
AB - Effective nitrogen (N) management is essential for minimizing fertilizer nutrient losses and maximizing N use efficiency. This study, conducted over two years on permanent grassland sites in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, explored the effects of urea treatment with a urease inhibitor and digestate acidification on N-cycling and yield performance in a temperate maritime grassland context. Micro plots within these grasslands received varying N rates via acidified (with sulphuric acid) or non-acidified digestate (biogas residues), urea treated with- or without urease inhibitor (N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide) or calcium ammonium nitrate. Parameters measured included dry and N matter accumulations, NH3 volatilization, N2O emissions, NO3--N leaching, methane (CH4), and total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from soils. The findings demonstrated that the acidified digestate consistently enhanced metabolizable energy (ME), N yields (up to 47 %) and the apparent N recovery (ANR). While the acidified digestate and treated urea concurrently reduced NH3 emissions, the treated urea did not significantly affect (p> 0.05) dry matter (DM) and N yields, ANR, or total GHG emissions. Thus, digestate acidification or urea N stabilization could effectively mitigate the environmental impact of forage grass production while maintaining higher or comparable yields. However, higher risks of pollution swapping to groundwater bodies may result from higher N input rates. Applying acidified digestate or stabilized urea N to grasslands at a 120 kg mineral N ha−1 rate offers a practical approach, yielding appreciable N and ME while minimizing N losses.
KW - Digestate acidification
KW - Grassland production
KW - Greenhouse gas emissions
KW - Nitrogen management
KW - Urea treatment
U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2024.109185
DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2024.109185
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85199218565
SN - 0167-8809
VL - 375
JO - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
JF - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
M1 - 109185
ER -