The effectiveness of environmental assessment in Flanders

An analysis of practitioner perspectives

Hens Runhaar*, Annick Gommers, Katelijne Verhaegen, Katrien Cooman, Peter Corens

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The extent to which Environmental Assessment (EA) contributes to incorporating environmental values and objectives into decision-making (i.e. the effectiveness of EA) has been subject to much research. Still relatively little is known about how the effectiveness of EA is influenced by the specific features of EA systems and their context. International comparative research can shed more light on these relationships. In this paper we report on a survey of EA in Flanders, taking a similar approach as previous surveys in the Netherlands, UK and Denmark. We observe that the effectiveness of the Flemish project-based EA (EIA) is comparable to that in the other countries, whereas the Flemish plan-based EA (SEA) is more influential than the Dutch one (no data on Denmark and UK). As in the other countries, EA in Flanders has an influence on decision-making both before and after the EIA has been completed. According to respondents to the surveys, in all four countries the legal requirement is the main explanatory factor for EA effectiveness. The mechanisms by which EA characteristics and other factors contribute to EA effectiveness seem rather country-specific, however. Rather than trying to isolate the individual influence of factors we encourage more in-depth, qualitative and case-study based follow-up research in order to better understand the complex interplay between factors related to the EA system itself, how it is applied in practice and influenceds from its specific context.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-119
Number of pages7
JournalEnvironmental Impact Assessment Review
Volume76
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Fingerprint

environmental assessment
Denmark
analysis
decision making
environmental values
comparative research
Netherlands

Keywords

  • Belgium
  • Environmental impact assessment (EIA)
  • Performance
  • Strategic environmental assessment (SEA)
  • Survey

Cite this

Runhaar, Hens ; Gommers, Annick ; Verhaegen, Katelijne ; Cooman, Katrien ; Corens, Peter. / The effectiveness of environmental assessment in Flanders : An analysis of practitioner perspectives. In: Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2019 ; Vol. 76. pp. 113-119.
@article{04654b72350a4c1b826eec66ef6c73a4,
title = "The effectiveness of environmental assessment in Flanders: An analysis of practitioner perspectives",
abstract = "The extent to which Environmental Assessment (EA) contributes to incorporating environmental values and objectives into decision-making (i.e. the effectiveness of EA) has been subject to much research. Still relatively little is known about how the effectiveness of EA is influenced by the specific features of EA systems and their context. International comparative research can shed more light on these relationships. In this paper we report on a survey of EA in Flanders, taking a similar approach as previous surveys in the Netherlands, UK and Denmark. We observe that the effectiveness of the Flemish project-based EA (EIA) is comparable to that in the other countries, whereas the Flemish plan-based EA (SEA) is more influential than the Dutch one (no data on Denmark and UK). As in the other countries, EA in Flanders has an influence on decision-making both before and after the EIA has been completed. According to respondents to the surveys, in all four countries the legal requirement is the main explanatory factor for EA effectiveness. The mechanisms by which EA characteristics and other factors contribute to EA effectiveness seem rather country-specific, however. Rather than trying to isolate the individual influence of factors we encourage more in-depth, qualitative and case-study based follow-up research in order to better understand the complex interplay between factors related to the EA system itself, how it is applied in practice and influenceds from its specific context.",
keywords = "Belgium, Environmental impact assessment (EIA), Performance, Strategic environmental assessment (SEA), Survey",
author = "Hens Runhaar and Annick Gommers and Katelijne Verhaegen and Katrien Cooman and Peter Corens",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.eiar.2019.02.006",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "113--119",
journal = "Environmental Impact Assessment Review",
issn = "0195-9255",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

The effectiveness of environmental assessment in Flanders : An analysis of practitioner perspectives. / Runhaar, Hens; Gommers, Annick; Verhaegen, Katelijne; Cooman, Katrien; Corens, Peter.

In: Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 76, 01.05.2019, p. 113-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effectiveness of environmental assessment in Flanders

T2 - An analysis of practitioner perspectives

AU - Runhaar, Hens

AU - Gommers, Annick

AU - Verhaegen, Katelijne

AU - Cooman, Katrien

AU - Corens, Peter

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - The extent to which Environmental Assessment (EA) contributes to incorporating environmental values and objectives into decision-making (i.e. the effectiveness of EA) has been subject to much research. Still relatively little is known about how the effectiveness of EA is influenced by the specific features of EA systems and their context. International comparative research can shed more light on these relationships. In this paper we report on a survey of EA in Flanders, taking a similar approach as previous surveys in the Netherlands, UK and Denmark. We observe that the effectiveness of the Flemish project-based EA (EIA) is comparable to that in the other countries, whereas the Flemish plan-based EA (SEA) is more influential than the Dutch one (no data on Denmark and UK). As in the other countries, EA in Flanders has an influence on decision-making both before and after the EIA has been completed. According to respondents to the surveys, in all four countries the legal requirement is the main explanatory factor for EA effectiveness. The mechanisms by which EA characteristics and other factors contribute to EA effectiveness seem rather country-specific, however. Rather than trying to isolate the individual influence of factors we encourage more in-depth, qualitative and case-study based follow-up research in order to better understand the complex interplay between factors related to the EA system itself, how it is applied in practice and influenceds from its specific context.

AB - The extent to which Environmental Assessment (EA) contributes to incorporating environmental values and objectives into decision-making (i.e. the effectiveness of EA) has been subject to much research. Still relatively little is known about how the effectiveness of EA is influenced by the specific features of EA systems and their context. International comparative research can shed more light on these relationships. In this paper we report on a survey of EA in Flanders, taking a similar approach as previous surveys in the Netherlands, UK and Denmark. We observe that the effectiveness of the Flemish project-based EA (EIA) is comparable to that in the other countries, whereas the Flemish plan-based EA (SEA) is more influential than the Dutch one (no data on Denmark and UK). As in the other countries, EA in Flanders has an influence on decision-making both before and after the EIA has been completed. According to respondents to the surveys, in all four countries the legal requirement is the main explanatory factor for EA effectiveness. The mechanisms by which EA characteristics and other factors contribute to EA effectiveness seem rather country-specific, however. Rather than trying to isolate the individual influence of factors we encourage more in-depth, qualitative and case-study based follow-up research in order to better understand the complex interplay between factors related to the EA system itself, how it is applied in practice and influenceds from its specific context.

KW - Belgium

KW - Environmental impact assessment (EIA)

KW - Performance

KW - Strategic environmental assessment (SEA)

KW - Survey

U2 - 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.02.006

DO - 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.02.006

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 113

EP - 119

JO - Environmental Impact Assessment Review

JF - Environmental Impact Assessment Review

SN - 0195-9255

ER -