The effect of different mitigation strategies on international financing of adaptation

A.F. Hof, K.C. de Bruin, R.B. Dellink, M.G.J. den Elzen, D.P. van Vuuren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent proposals at the UNFCCC meeting in Bali in December 2007 suggest that a 2% levy on the CDM could finance adaptation costs in developing regions. Other proposals include extending the scope of the levy to emissions trading. This study applies an Integrated Assessment Model to gain insight in the interactions between adaptation costs, residual damages and mitigation costs and to analyse the effectiveness of a 2% levy on both the CDM and emissions trading from developing countries. We show that adaptation is especially important in lower income regions where damages are higher. The revenues of a 2% levy strongly depend on both the climate mitigation target and the burden-sharing regime. A more stringent climate mitigation target results in more emissions trade and, in the longer run, less need for adaptation. Both factors increase the share of adaptation costs that can be funded. The burden-sharing regime strongly affects the revenues of a 2% levy as well: relatively more stringent targets for developed countries increase the revenues of a 2% levy. However, in the next two decades the share of adaptation that can be financed remains well below 20% in most cases. Additional funding mechanisms are therefore necessary to substantially finance adaptation costs in developing countries.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)832-843
JournalEnvironmental Science & Policy
Volume12
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

mitigation
costs
revenue
emissions trading
cost
finance
damages
developing world
developing country
climate
regime
damage
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
financing
effect
levy
low income
funding
income
interaction

Keywords

  • climate-change
  • greenhouse gases
  • damage costs
  • trade-offs
  • model
  • policy
  • projections
  • economics
  • targets
  • regimes

Cite this

Hof, A. F., de Bruin, K. C., Dellink, R. B., den Elzen, M. G. J., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2009). The effect of different mitigation strategies on international financing of adaptation. Environmental Science & Policy, 12(7), 832-843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.08.007
Hof, A.F. ; de Bruin, K.C. ; Dellink, R.B. ; den Elzen, M.G.J. ; van Vuuren, D.P. / The effect of different mitigation strategies on international financing of adaptation. In: Environmental Science & Policy. 2009 ; Vol. 12, No. 7. pp. 832-843.
@article{8f70a57a10b44b1d858ecd3ebae666b1,
title = "The effect of different mitigation strategies on international financing of adaptation",
abstract = "Recent proposals at the UNFCCC meeting in Bali in December 2007 suggest that a 2{\%} levy on the CDM could finance adaptation costs in developing regions. Other proposals include extending the scope of the levy to emissions trading. This study applies an Integrated Assessment Model to gain insight in the interactions between adaptation costs, residual damages and mitigation costs and to analyse the effectiveness of a 2{\%} levy on both the CDM and emissions trading from developing countries. We show that adaptation is especially important in lower income regions where damages are higher. The revenues of a 2{\%} levy strongly depend on both the climate mitigation target and the burden-sharing regime. A more stringent climate mitigation target results in more emissions trade and, in the longer run, less need for adaptation. Both factors increase the share of adaptation costs that can be funded. The burden-sharing regime strongly affects the revenues of a 2{\%} levy as well: relatively more stringent targets for developed countries increase the revenues of a 2{\%} levy. However, in the next two decades the share of adaptation that can be financed remains well below 20{\%} in most cases. Additional funding mechanisms are therefore necessary to substantially finance adaptation costs in developing countries.",
keywords = "climate-change, greenhouse gases, damage costs, trade-offs, model, policy, projections, economics, targets, regimes",
author = "A.F. Hof and {de Bruin}, K.C. and R.B. Dellink and {den Elzen}, M.G.J. and {van Vuuren}, D.P.",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2009.08.007",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "832--843",
journal = "Environmental Science & Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "7",

}

Hof, AF, de Bruin, KC, Dellink, RB, den Elzen, MGJ & van Vuuren, DP 2009, 'The effect of different mitigation strategies on international financing of adaptation', Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 832-843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.08.007

The effect of different mitigation strategies on international financing of adaptation. / Hof, A.F.; de Bruin, K.C.; Dellink, R.B.; den Elzen, M.G.J.; van Vuuren, D.P.

In: Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 12, No. 7, 2009, p. 832-843.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of different mitigation strategies on international financing of adaptation

AU - Hof, A.F.

AU - de Bruin, K.C.

AU - Dellink, R.B.

AU - den Elzen, M.G.J.

AU - van Vuuren, D.P.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Recent proposals at the UNFCCC meeting in Bali in December 2007 suggest that a 2% levy on the CDM could finance adaptation costs in developing regions. Other proposals include extending the scope of the levy to emissions trading. This study applies an Integrated Assessment Model to gain insight in the interactions between adaptation costs, residual damages and mitigation costs and to analyse the effectiveness of a 2% levy on both the CDM and emissions trading from developing countries. We show that adaptation is especially important in lower income regions where damages are higher. The revenues of a 2% levy strongly depend on both the climate mitigation target and the burden-sharing regime. A more stringent climate mitigation target results in more emissions trade and, in the longer run, less need for adaptation. Both factors increase the share of adaptation costs that can be funded. The burden-sharing regime strongly affects the revenues of a 2% levy as well: relatively more stringent targets for developed countries increase the revenues of a 2% levy. However, in the next two decades the share of adaptation that can be financed remains well below 20% in most cases. Additional funding mechanisms are therefore necessary to substantially finance adaptation costs in developing countries.

AB - Recent proposals at the UNFCCC meeting in Bali in December 2007 suggest that a 2% levy on the CDM could finance adaptation costs in developing regions. Other proposals include extending the scope of the levy to emissions trading. This study applies an Integrated Assessment Model to gain insight in the interactions between adaptation costs, residual damages and mitigation costs and to analyse the effectiveness of a 2% levy on both the CDM and emissions trading from developing countries. We show that adaptation is especially important in lower income regions where damages are higher. The revenues of a 2% levy strongly depend on both the climate mitigation target and the burden-sharing regime. A more stringent climate mitigation target results in more emissions trade and, in the longer run, less need for adaptation. Both factors increase the share of adaptation costs that can be funded. The burden-sharing regime strongly affects the revenues of a 2% levy as well: relatively more stringent targets for developed countries increase the revenues of a 2% levy. However, in the next two decades the share of adaptation that can be financed remains well below 20% in most cases. Additional funding mechanisms are therefore necessary to substantially finance adaptation costs in developing countries.

KW - climate-change

KW - greenhouse gases

KW - damage costs

KW - trade-offs

KW - model

KW - policy

KW - projections

KW - economics

KW - targets

KW - regimes

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.08.007

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.08.007

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 832

EP - 843

JO - Environmental Science & Policy

JF - Environmental Science & Policy

SN - 1462-9011

IS - 7

ER -