The Behaviour of the Average Consumer: A Little Less Normativity and a Little More Reality in the Court's Case Law? Reflections on Teekanne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Teekanne, the Court of Justice held that the labelling of foodstuffs may not give the
impression that an ingredient is present in a product where it is in fact not present, and this is
apparent solely from the list of ingredients on the packaging. The judgment marks a
significant realignment of previous cases that had considered the behaviour of consumers
regarding the list of ingredients. In prior case law the Court had found consumers to be
adequately protected if they had the possibility to gather the relevant information from the list
of ingredients. In Teekanne, the Court stipulated that such information on the ingredients list
is not able to “correct” a “consumer’s erroneous or misleading impression” created by the
“overall labelling” taken as a whole. The ruling is potentially the first case in a series of
judgments that understands the “average consumer” in a less normative way, and is open to
arguments about the real-world vulnerability levels of consumers.
LanguageEnglish
Pages590-598
JournalEuropean Law Review
Volume41
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2016

Fingerprint

normativity
case law
court of justice
vulnerability

Keywords

  • Unfair Commercial Practices, EU law, Average Consumer, Behavioural Law

Cite this

@article{d2d96760627345bca2e4c3bc847f8656,
title = "The Behaviour of the Average Consumer: A Little Less Normativity and a Little More Reality in the Court's Case Law? Reflections on Teekanne",
abstract = "In Teekanne, the Court of Justice held that the labelling of foodstuffs may not give theimpression that an ingredient is present in a product where it is in fact not present, and this isapparent solely from the list of ingredients on the packaging. The judgment marks asignificant realignment of previous cases that had considered the behaviour of consumersregarding the list of ingredients. In prior case law the Court had found consumers to beadequately protected if they had the possibility to gather the relevant information from the listof ingredients. In Teekanne, the Court stipulated that such information on the ingredients listis not able to “correct” a “consumer’s erroneous or misleading impression” created by the“overall labelling” taken as a whole. The ruling is potentially the first case in a series ofjudgments that understands the “average consumer” in a less normative way, and is open toarguments about the real-world vulnerability levels of consumers.",
keywords = "Unfair Commercial Practices, EU law, Average Consumer, Behavioural Law",
author = "H. Schebesta and K. Purnhagen",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "590--598",
journal = "European Law Review",
issn = "0307-5400",
publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell",
number = "4",

}

The Behaviour of the Average Consumer: A Little Less Normativity and a Little More Reality in the Court's Case Law? Reflections on Teekanne. / Schebesta, H.; Purnhagen, K.

In: European Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 4, 01.08.2016, p. 590-598.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Behaviour of the Average Consumer: A Little Less Normativity and a Little More Reality in the Court's Case Law? Reflections on Teekanne

AU - Schebesta, H.

AU - Purnhagen, K.

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - In Teekanne, the Court of Justice held that the labelling of foodstuffs may not give theimpression that an ingredient is present in a product where it is in fact not present, and this isapparent solely from the list of ingredients on the packaging. The judgment marks asignificant realignment of previous cases that had considered the behaviour of consumersregarding the list of ingredients. In prior case law the Court had found consumers to beadequately protected if they had the possibility to gather the relevant information from the listof ingredients. In Teekanne, the Court stipulated that such information on the ingredients listis not able to “correct” a “consumer’s erroneous or misleading impression” created by the“overall labelling” taken as a whole. The ruling is potentially the first case in a series ofjudgments that understands the “average consumer” in a less normative way, and is open toarguments about the real-world vulnerability levels of consumers.

AB - In Teekanne, the Court of Justice held that the labelling of foodstuffs may not give theimpression that an ingredient is present in a product where it is in fact not present, and this isapparent solely from the list of ingredients on the packaging. The judgment marks asignificant realignment of previous cases that had considered the behaviour of consumersregarding the list of ingredients. In prior case law the Court had found consumers to beadequately protected if they had the possibility to gather the relevant information from the listof ingredients. In Teekanne, the Court stipulated that such information on the ingredients listis not able to “correct” a “consumer’s erroneous or misleading impression” created by the“overall labelling” taken as a whole. The ruling is potentially the first case in a series ofjudgments that understands the “average consumer” in a less normative way, and is open toarguments about the real-world vulnerability levels of consumers.

KW - Unfair Commercial Practices, EU law, Average Consumer, Behavioural Law

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 590

EP - 598

JO - European Law Review

T2 - European Law Review

JF - European Law Review

SN - 0307-5400

IS - 4

ER -