The assessment of selectivity in different quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometry acquisition

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Selectivity of the confirmation of identity in liquid chromatography (tandem) mass spectrometry using Q-Orbitrap instrumentation was assessed using different acquisition modes based on a representative experimental data set constructed from 108 samples, including six different matrix extracts and containing over 100 analytes each. Single stage full scan, all ion fragmentation, and product ion scanning were applied. By generating reconstructed ion chromatograms using unit mass window in targeted MS(2), selected reaction monitoring (SRM), regularly applied using triple-quadrupole instruments, was mimicked. This facilitated the comparison of single stage full scan, all ion fragmentation, (mimicked) SRM, and product ion scanning applying a mass window down to 1 ppm. Single factor Analysis of Variance was carried out on the variance (s(2)) of the mass error to determine which factors and interactions are significant parameters with respect to selectivity. We conclude that selectivity is related to the target compound (mainly the mass defect), the matrix, sample clean-up, concentration, and mass resolution. Selectivity of the different instrumental configurations was quantified by counting the number of interfering peaks observed in the chromatograms. We conclude that precursor ion selection significantly contributes to selectivity: monitoring of a single product ion at high mass accuracy with a 1 Da precursor ion window proved to be equally selective or better to monitoring two transition products in mimicked SRM. In contrast, monitoring a single fragment in all ion fragmentation mode results in significantly lower selectivity versus mimicked SRM. After a thorough inter-laboratory evaluation study, the results of this study can be used for a critical reassessment of the current identification points system and contribute to the next generation of evidence-based and robust performance criteria in residue analysis and sports doping.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-346
JournalJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Mass spectrometry
Mass Spectrometry
Ions
Monitoring
Scanning
Liquid chromatography
Factor analysis
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Sports
Liquid Chromatography
Statistical Factor Analysis
Analysis of Variance
Doping (additives)
Defects

Keywords

  • performance liquid-chromatography
  • veterinary drugs
  • confirmation
  • metabolites
  • residues
  • plasma
  • food
  • meat

Cite this

@article{9629da788d294163a4e3761a5ad328bc,
title = "The assessment of selectivity in different quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometry acquisition",
abstract = "Selectivity of the confirmation of identity in liquid chromatography (tandem) mass spectrometry using Q-Orbitrap instrumentation was assessed using different acquisition modes based on a representative experimental data set constructed from 108 samples, including six different matrix extracts and containing over 100 analytes each. Single stage full scan, all ion fragmentation, and product ion scanning were applied. By generating reconstructed ion chromatograms using unit mass window in targeted MS(2), selected reaction monitoring (SRM), regularly applied using triple-quadrupole instruments, was mimicked. This facilitated the comparison of single stage full scan, all ion fragmentation, (mimicked) SRM, and product ion scanning applying a mass window down to 1 ppm. Single factor Analysis of Variance was carried out on the variance (s(2)) of the mass error to determine which factors and interactions are significant parameters with respect to selectivity. We conclude that selectivity is related to the target compound (mainly the mass defect), the matrix, sample clean-up, concentration, and mass resolution. Selectivity of the different instrumental configurations was quantified by counting the number of interfering peaks observed in the chromatograms. We conclude that precursor ion selection significantly contributes to selectivity: monitoring of a single product ion at high mass accuracy with a 1 Da precursor ion window proved to be equally selective or better to monitoring two transition products in mimicked SRM. In contrast, monitoring a single fragment in all ion fragmentation mode results in significantly lower selectivity versus mimicked SRM. After a thorough inter-laboratory evaluation study, the results of this study can be used for a critical reassessment of the current identification points system and contribute to the next generation of evidence-based and robust performance criteria in residue analysis and sports doping.",
keywords = "performance liquid-chromatography, veterinary drugs, confirmation, metabolites, residues, plasma, food, meat",
author = "B.J.A. Berendsen and R.S. Wegh and T. Meijer and M.W.F. Nielen",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s13361-014-1021-x",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "337--346",
journal = "Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry",
issn = "1044-0305",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

The assessment of selectivity in different quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometry acquisition. / Berendsen, B.J.A.; Wegh, R.S.; Meijer, T.; Nielen, M.W.F.

In: Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2015, p. 337-346.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The assessment of selectivity in different quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometry acquisition

AU - Berendsen, B.J.A.

AU - Wegh, R.S.

AU - Meijer, T.

AU - Nielen, M.W.F.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Selectivity of the confirmation of identity in liquid chromatography (tandem) mass spectrometry using Q-Orbitrap instrumentation was assessed using different acquisition modes based on a representative experimental data set constructed from 108 samples, including six different matrix extracts and containing over 100 analytes each. Single stage full scan, all ion fragmentation, and product ion scanning were applied. By generating reconstructed ion chromatograms using unit mass window in targeted MS(2), selected reaction monitoring (SRM), regularly applied using triple-quadrupole instruments, was mimicked. This facilitated the comparison of single stage full scan, all ion fragmentation, (mimicked) SRM, and product ion scanning applying a mass window down to 1 ppm. Single factor Analysis of Variance was carried out on the variance (s(2)) of the mass error to determine which factors and interactions are significant parameters with respect to selectivity. We conclude that selectivity is related to the target compound (mainly the mass defect), the matrix, sample clean-up, concentration, and mass resolution. Selectivity of the different instrumental configurations was quantified by counting the number of interfering peaks observed in the chromatograms. We conclude that precursor ion selection significantly contributes to selectivity: monitoring of a single product ion at high mass accuracy with a 1 Da precursor ion window proved to be equally selective or better to monitoring two transition products in mimicked SRM. In contrast, monitoring a single fragment in all ion fragmentation mode results in significantly lower selectivity versus mimicked SRM. After a thorough inter-laboratory evaluation study, the results of this study can be used for a critical reassessment of the current identification points system and contribute to the next generation of evidence-based and robust performance criteria in residue analysis and sports doping.

AB - Selectivity of the confirmation of identity in liquid chromatography (tandem) mass spectrometry using Q-Orbitrap instrumentation was assessed using different acquisition modes based on a representative experimental data set constructed from 108 samples, including six different matrix extracts and containing over 100 analytes each. Single stage full scan, all ion fragmentation, and product ion scanning were applied. By generating reconstructed ion chromatograms using unit mass window in targeted MS(2), selected reaction monitoring (SRM), regularly applied using triple-quadrupole instruments, was mimicked. This facilitated the comparison of single stage full scan, all ion fragmentation, (mimicked) SRM, and product ion scanning applying a mass window down to 1 ppm. Single factor Analysis of Variance was carried out on the variance (s(2)) of the mass error to determine which factors and interactions are significant parameters with respect to selectivity. We conclude that selectivity is related to the target compound (mainly the mass defect), the matrix, sample clean-up, concentration, and mass resolution. Selectivity of the different instrumental configurations was quantified by counting the number of interfering peaks observed in the chromatograms. We conclude that precursor ion selection significantly contributes to selectivity: monitoring of a single product ion at high mass accuracy with a 1 Da precursor ion window proved to be equally selective or better to monitoring two transition products in mimicked SRM. In contrast, monitoring a single fragment in all ion fragmentation mode results in significantly lower selectivity versus mimicked SRM. After a thorough inter-laboratory evaluation study, the results of this study can be used for a critical reassessment of the current identification points system and contribute to the next generation of evidence-based and robust performance criteria in residue analysis and sports doping.

KW - performance liquid-chromatography

KW - veterinary drugs

KW - confirmation

KW - metabolites

KW - residues

KW - plasma

KW - food

KW - meat

U2 - 10.1007/s13361-014-1021-x

DO - 10.1007/s13361-014-1021-x

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 337

EP - 346

JO - Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry

JF - Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry

SN - 1044-0305

IS - 2

ER -