Thank You to Our 2019 Peer Reviewers

Gabriel Filippelli; Rita R. Colwell; Susan Anenberg; John Balbus; Daniela Ceccarelli; Karen A. Hudson-Edwards; Antarpreet Jutla; Chiyuan Miao; Paul A. Sandifer; Avner Vengosh

doi:10.1029/2020GH000250

Thank You to Our 2019 Peer Reviewers

Gabriel Filippelli^*, Rita R. Colwell, Susan Anenberg, John Balbus, Daniela Ceccarelli, Karen A. Hudson-Edwards, Antarpreet Jutla, Chiyuan Miao, Paul A. Sandifer, Avner Vengosh

^*Corresponding author for this work

Epidemiology, Bio-informatics & Animal models

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › Academic

Abstract

Peer review is at the heart of the scientific endeavor, ensuring that high‐quality discoveries are communicated in effective and impactful ways. As a voluntary and mostly anonymous effort, peer review is often poorly recognized. But it is so valuable to journal Editors, and we are often so impressed by the incredibly detailed, constructive, and informative reviews that we get back from reviewers. In 2019, GeoHealth benefited from more than 94 reviews provided by 73 of our peers for papers submitted to the journal. Thank you all for being such an important part of the scientific process, advancing the communication of discoveries at the intersections of the environmental and health sciences to improve society.

Original language	English
Article number	e2020GH000250
Journal	GeoHealth
Volume	4
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GH000250
Publication status	Published - Mar 2020

Keywords

editorial
peer review

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1029/2020GH000250Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

https://edepot.wur.nl/528506Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{806245c156b14e28a9c0f79fccc916fa,

title = "Thank You to Our 2019 Peer Reviewers",

abstract = "Peer review is at the heart of the scientific endeavor, ensuring that high‐quality discoveries are communicated in effective and impactful ways. As a voluntary and mostly anonymous effort, peer review is often poorly recognized. But it is so valuable to journal Editors, and we are often so impressed by the incredibly detailed, constructive, and informative reviews that we get back from reviewers. In 2019, GeoHealth benefited from more than 94 reviews provided by 73 of our peers for papers submitted to the journal. Thank you all for being such an important part of the scientific process, advancing the communication of discoveries at the intersections of the environmental and health sciences to improve society.",

keywords = "editorial, peer review",

author = "Gabriel Filippelli and Colwell, {Rita R.} and Susan Anenberg and John Balbus and Daniela Ceccarelli and Hudson-Edwards, {Karen A.} and Antarpreet Jutla and Chiyuan Miao and Sandifer, {Paul A.} and Avner Vengosh",

year = "2020",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1029/2020GH000250",

language = "English",

volume = "4",

journal = "GeoHealth",

issn = "2471-1403",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thank You to Our 2019 Peer Reviewers

AU - Filippelli, Gabriel

AU - Colwell, Rita R.

AU - Anenberg, Susan

AU - Balbus, John

AU - Ceccarelli, Daniela

AU - Hudson-Edwards, Karen A.

AU - Jutla, Antarpreet

AU - Miao, Chiyuan

AU - Sandifer, Paul A.

AU - Vengosh, Avner

PY - 2020/3

Y1 - 2020/3

N2 - Peer review is at the heart of the scientific endeavor, ensuring that high‐quality discoveries are communicated in effective and impactful ways. As a voluntary and mostly anonymous effort, peer review is often poorly recognized. But it is so valuable to journal Editors, and we are often so impressed by the incredibly detailed, constructive, and informative reviews that we get back from reviewers. In 2019, GeoHealth benefited from more than 94 reviews provided by 73 of our peers for papers submitted to the journal. Thank you all for being such an important part of the scientific process, advancing the communication of discoveries at the intersections of the environmental and health sciences to improve society.

AB - Peer review is at the heart of the scientific endeavor, ensuring that high‐quality discoveries are communicated in effective and impactful ways. As a voluntary and mostly anonymous effort, peer review is often poorly recognized. But it is so valuable to journal Editors, and we are often so impressed by the incredibly detailed, constructive, and informative reviews that we get back from reviewers. In 2019, GeoHealth benefited from more than 94 reviews provided by 73 of our peers for papers submitted to the journal. Thank you all for being such an important part of the scientific process, advancing the communication of discoveries at the intersections of the environmental and health sciences to improve society.

KW - editorial

KW - peer review

U2 - 10.1029/2020GH000250

DO - 10.1029/2020GH000250

M3 - Editorial

AN - SCOPUS:85084155173

SN - 2471-1403

VL - 4

JO - GeoHealth

JF - GeoHealth

IS - 3

M1 - e2020GH000250

ER -

Thank You to Our 2019 Peer Reviewers

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this