Testing the Australian Weed Risk Assessment with different estimates for invasiveness

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Weed Risk Assessment (WRA) has become an effective tool in predicting invasiveness of exotic plant species. In studies testing the WRA, exotic plant species are usually divided into major weeds, minor weeds and non-weeds. However, these divisions are qualitative, as the categories are assigned by experts. Many studies searching for plant traits that are indicative of plant invasiveness use quantitative estimates to measure invasiveness. We compared how quantitative and qualitative estimates of invasiveness may relate to WRA scores. As quantitative estimates we used regional frequency (spread), change in regional frequency and local dominance of naturalized exotic plant species in The Netherlands. To obtain a qualitative estimate we determined if the exotic plant species occurred on a black list in neighbouring regions. We related WRA scores of the exotic plant species to these qualitative and quantitative estimates of invasiveness. Our results reveal that the WRA predicted the qualitative (black list) estimate more accurately than the quantitative (dominance and spread) ones. The black list estimate matches with the overall impact of exotic species, which is assumed to incorporate regional spread, local dominance and noxiousness. Therefore, the WRA predicts the noxiousness component, but to a lesser extent the spatial components of impact of exotic species. On the other hand, studies that use regional spread and other quantitative estimates of invasiveness tend not to include the noxiousness component of impact. We propose that our analyses may also help to further solve the recent debate on whether or not performing research on exotic species.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1319-1330
JournalBiological Invasions
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

invasiveness
risk assessment
weed
weeds
testing
Netherlands
plant species

Keywords

  • assessment system
  • plant invasiveness
  • success
  • invasion
  • europe
  • flora
  • history
  • tool

Cite this

@article{cccd07334353414e84d828b9021bff69,
title = "Testing the Australian Weed Risk Assessment with different estimates for invasiveness",
abstract = "The Weed Risk Assessment (WRA) has become an effective tool in predicting invasiveness of exotic plant species. In studies testing the WRA, exotic plant species are usually divided into major weeds, minor weeds and non-weeds. However, these divisions are qualitative, as the categories are assigned by experts. Many studies searching for plant traits that are indicative of plant invasiveness use quantitative estimates to measure invasiveness. We compared how quantitative and qualitative estimates of invasiveness may relate to WRA scores. As quantitative estimates we used regional frequency (spread), change in regional frequency and local dominance of naturalized exotic plant species in The Netherlands. To obtain a qualitative estimate we determined if the exotic plant species occurred on a black list in neighbouring regions. We related WRA scores of the exotic plant species to these qualitative and quantitative estimates of invasiveness. Our results reveal that the WRA predicted the qualitative (black list) estimate more accurately than the quantitative (dominance and spread) ones. The black list estimate matches with the overall impact of exotic species, which is assumed to incorporate regional spread, local dominance and noxiousness. Therefore, the WRA predicts the noxiousness component, but to a lesser extent the spatial components of impact of exotic species. On the other hand, studies that use regional spread and other quantitative estimates of invasiveness tend not to include the noxiousness component of impact. We propose that our analyses may also help to further solve the recent debate on whether or not performing research on exotic species.",
keywords = "assessment system, plant invasiveness, success, invasion, europe, flora, history, tool",
author = "T.A.A. Speek and J.A.R. Davies and L.A.P. Lotz and {van der Putten}, W.H.",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/s10530-012-0368-9",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "1319--1330",
journal = "Biological Invasions",
issn = "1387-3547",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "6",

}

Testing the Australian Weed Risk Assessment with different estimates for invasiveness. / Speek, T.A.A.; Davies, J.A.R.; Lotz, L.A.P.; van der Putten, W.H.

In: Biological Invasions, Vol. 15, No. 6, 2013, p. 1319-1330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing the Australian Weed Risk Assessment with different estimates for invasiveness

AU - Speek, T.A.A.

AU - Davies, J.A.R.

AU - Lotz, L.A.P.

AU - van der Putten, W.H.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The Weed Risk Assessment (WRA) has become an effective tool in predicting invasiveness of exotic plant species. In studies testing the WRA, exotic plant species are usually divided into major weeds, minor weeds and non-weeds. However, these divisions are qualitative, as the categories are assigned by experts. Many studies searching for plant traits that are indicative of plant invasiveness use quantitative estimates to measure invasiveness. We compared how quantitative and qualitative estimates of invasiveness may relate to WRA scores. As quantitative estimates we used regional frequency (spread), change in regional frequency and local dominance of naturalized exotic plant species in The Netherlands. To obtain a qualitative estimate we determined if the exotic plant species occurred on a black list in neighbouring regions. We related WRA scores of the exotic plant species to these qualitative and quantitative estimates of invasiveness. Our results reveal that the WRA predicted the qualitative (black list) estimate more accurately than the quantitative (dominance and spread) ones. The black list estimate matches with the overall impact of exotic species, which is assumed to incorporate regional spread, local dominance and noxiousness. Therefore, the WRA predicts the noxiousness component, but to a lesser extent the spatial components of impact of exotic species. On the other hand, studies that use regional spread and other quantitative estimates of invasiveness tend not to include the noxiousness component of impact. We propose that our analyses may also help to further solve the recent debate on whether or not performing research on exotic species.

AB - The Weed Risk Assessment (WRA) has become an effective tool in predicting invasiveness of exotic plant species. In studies testing the WRA, exotic plant species are usually divided into major weeds, minor weeds and non-weeds. However, these divisions are qualitative, as the categories are assigned by experts. Many studies searching for plant traits that are indicative of plant invasiveness use quantitative estimates to measure invasiveness. We compared how quantitative and qualitative estimates of invasiveness may relate to WRA scores. As quantitative estimates we used regional frequency (spread), change in regional frequency and local dominance of naturalized exotic plant species in The Netherlands. To obtain a qualitative estimate we determined if the exotic plant species occurred on a black list in neighbouring regions. We related WRA scores of the exotic plant species to these qualitative and quantitative estimates of invasiveness. Our results reveal that the WRA predicted the qualitative (black list) estimate more accurately than the quantitative (dominance and spread) ones. The black list estimate matches with the overall impact of exotic species, which is assumed to incorporate regional spread, local dominance and noxiousness. Therefore, the WRA predicts the noxiousness component, but to a lesser extent the spatial components of impact of exotic species. On the other hand, studies that use regional spread and other quantitative estimates of invasiveness tend not to include the noxiousness component of impact. We propose that our analyses may also help to further solve the recent debate on whether or not performing research on exotic species.

KW - assessment system

KW - plant invasiveness

KW - success

KW - invasion

KW - europe

KW - flora

KW - history

KW - tool

U2 - 10.1007/s10530-012-0368-9

DO - 10.1007/s10530-012-0368-9

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 1319

EP - 1330

JO - Biological Invasions

JF - Biological Invasions

SN - 1387-3547

IS - 6

ER -