Systematic differences in the response of genetic variation to pedigree and genome-based selection methods

M. Heidaritabar, A. Vereijken, W.M. Muir, T.H.E. Meuwissen, H. Cheng, H.J.W.C. Megens, M. Groenen, J.W.M. Bastiaansen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) is a DNA-based method of selecting for quantitative traits in animal and plant breeding, and offers a potentially superior alternative to traditional breeding methods that rely on pedigree and phenotype information. Using a 60¿K SNP chip with markers spaced throughout the entire chicken genome, we compared the impact of GS and traditional BLUP (best linear unbiased prediction) selection methods applied side-by-side in three different lines of egg-laying chickens. Differences were demonstrated between methods, both at the level and genomic distribution of allele frequency changes. In all three lines, the average allele frequency changes were larger with GS, 0.056 0.064 and 0.066, compared with BLUP, 0.044, 0.045 and 0.036 for lines B1, B2 and W1, respectively. With BLUP, 35 selected regions (empirical P
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)503-513
JournalHeredity
Volume113
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • quantitative trait locus
  • positive selection
  • chicken
  • hitchhiking
  • programs
  • size

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic differences in the response of genetic variation to pedigree and genome-based selection methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this