TY - JOUR
T1 - Synthesis on the effectiveness of soil translocation for plant community restoration
AU - Gerrits, Gijs M.
AU - Waenink, Rik
AU - Aradottir, Asa L.
AU - Buisson, Elise
AU - Dutoit, Thierry
AU - Ferreira, Maxmiller C.
AU - Fontaine, Joseph B.
AU - Jaunatre, Renaud
AU - Kardol, Paul
AU - Loeb, Roos
AU - Magro Ruiz, Sandra
AU - Maltz, Mia
AU - Pärtel, Meelis
AU - Peco, Begona
AU - Piqueray, Julien
AU - Pilon, Natashi A.L.
AU - Santa-Regina, Ignacio
AU - Schmidt, Katharina T.
AU - Sengl, Philip
AU - van Diggelen, Rudy
AU - Vieira, Daniel L.M.
AU - von Brackel, Wolfgang
AU - Waryszak, Pawel
AU - Wills, Tim J.
AU - Marrs, Rob H.
AU - Wubs, Jasper
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Many degraded ecosystems need active restoration to conserve biodiversity and re-establish ecosystem function, both highlighted targets of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration and the proposed EU Nature restoration law. Soil translocation, where both plant propagules and their associated soil biota are co-introduced, has increasingly been proposed as a powerful restoration technique for terrestrial ecosystems. However, a synthesis of the effectiveness of this method across ecosystems is lacking. To address how soil translocation affects restoration success, we performed a meta-analysis synthesizing data from 46 field experiments and their respective reference ecosystems in 17 countries across four continents. In each experiment, vegetation composition was recorded in response to soil translocation treatments and the resultant vegetational changes (diversity and composition) were quantified. We found that soil translocation leads to plant community development further away from the control and more towards the reference plant communities compared with treatments where only plant propagules were introduced. However, the variability of effect sizes among experiments was large, suggesting strong dependence of restoration success on restoration context. We found that restoration success was more likely on loamy soils and when translocation treatments were implemented over larger spatial areas (>180 m2). Furthermore, we found that restoration success either consistently increased or decreased over time depending on the experiment. Not only is this congruent with positive feedbacks between plant and soil communities driving plant community development, but it also suggests that the composition of the translocated plant and soil communities, and initial starting conditions, are critical for long-term restoration success. Synthesis and applications. Our analysis highlights soil translocation can be a successful restoration method across a broad range of ecosystems. However, its implementation needs to depend on a thorough evaluation of local conditions and the potential added value. Further refinement of soil translocation techniques is needed to increase success rates.
AB - Many degraded ecosystems need active restoration to conserve biodiversity and re-establish ecosystem function, both highlighted targets of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration and the proposed EU Nature restoration law. Soil translocation, where both plant propagules and their associated soil biota are co-introduced, has increasingly been proposed as a powerful restoration technique for terrestrial ecosystems. However, a synthesis of the effectiveness of this method across ecosystems is lacking. To address how soil translocation affects restoration success, we performed a meta-analysis synthesizing data from 46 field experiments and their respective reference ecosystems in 17 countries across four continents. In each experiment, vegetation composition was recorded in response to soil translocation treatments and the resultant vegetational changes (diversity and composition) were quantified. We found that soil translocation leads to plant community development further away from the control and more towards the reference plant communities compared with treatments where only plant propagules were introduced. However, the variability of effect sizes among experiments was large, suggesting strong dependence of restoration success on restoration context. We found that restoration success was more likely on loamy soils and when translocation treatments were implemented over larger spatial areas (>180 m2). Furthermore, we found that restoration success either consistently increased or decreased over time depending on the experiment. Not only is this congruent with positive feedbacks between plant and soil communities driving plant community development, but it also suggests that the composition of the translocated plant and soil communities, and initial starting conditions, are critical for long-term restoration success. Synthesis and applications. Our analysis highlights soil translocation can be a successful restoration method across a broad range of ecosystems. However, its implementation needs to depend on a thorough evaluation of local conditions and the potential added value. Further refinement of soil translocation techniques is needed to increase success rates.
KW - above-ground–below-ground interactions
KW - degraded soils
KW - environmental filters
KW - meta-analysis
KW - restoration thresholds
KW - soil inoculation
KW - soil transfer
U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.14364
DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.14364
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85147996659
SN - 0021-8901
VL - 60
SP - 714
EP - 724
JO - Journal of Applied Ecology
JF - Journal of Applied Ecology
IS - 4
ER -