Abstract
While transdisciplinary knowledge production is increasingly gaining traction in academic and policy environments, initiating and guiding such approaches is not straightforward and comes with challenges. These challenges concern, among other things, methodological and practical difficulties that arise in the ‘fuzzy reality’ of doing transdisciplinary research. In this chapter, we elaborate on the different ways that the literature has dealt with design and evaluation of transdisciplinarity. We highlight a number of challenges in applying frameworks in the ‘real’ fuzzy work of transdisciplinary, look into three ideal-typical conceptualizations of transdisciplinary research and propose a number of ʼnon-negotiables’ in doing design and evaluation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Transdisciplinarity for Transformation |
| Subtitle of host publication | Responding to Societal Challenges through Multi-actor, Reflexive Practices |
| Editors | B.J. Regeer, P. Klaassen, J.E.W. Broerse |
| Place of Publication | Cham |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
| Pages | 79-110 |
| Number of pages | 32 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783031609749 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783031609732, 9783031609763 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Sept 2024 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Structuring Design & Evaluation in Transdisciplinarity for Transformation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver