Stakeholder viewpoints on facilitation of cross-border cooperation

João Augusto Rossi Borges*, Sabine Neuberger, Helmut Saatkamp, Alfons Oude Lansink, Dietrich Darr

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The European Union fosters cooperation in cross-border regions through the European Cohesion Policy (ECP). The implementation of ECP instruments requires a participatory approach, in which stakeholders’ views are acknowledged. However, the multiple of views among and between stakeholders of cross-border initiatives complicate their involvement in a participatory approach. A prerequisite for a meaningful involvement of all stakeholders is an in-depth understanding of their viewpoints on what facilitates cross-border cooperation. However, to date, these viewpoints are poorly understood. This study aims to identify and analyse stakeholders’ viewpoints on the facilitation of cross-border cooperation. The viewpoints of a sample of entrepreneurs, members of education institutes, and members from local institutions (policymakers and industry representatives) in the Dutch-German cross-border region Rhine-Waal were collected via Q methodology and complemented through interviews. Four viewpoints emerged: cooperation through pro-active engagement, cooperation through targeted policies, cooperation through an aligned institutional setup, and cooperation through socio-cultural proximity. Results can inform policy-making aimed to increase stakeholder involvement in participatory approaches in cross-border regions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)627-642
JournalEuropean Planning Studies
Volume30
Issue number4
Early online date7 Oct 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2022

Keywords

  • cooperation
  • cross-border region
  • European cohesion policy
  • Q methodology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stakeholder viewpoints on facilitation of cross-border cooperation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this