Abstract
Artificial illumination attracts insects, but to what extent light attracts insects, depends on the spectral composition of the light. Response models have been developed to predict the attractiveness of artificial light sources. In this study we compared attraction of insects by existing light sources used for streetlights as well as newly developed environment friendly alternatives, and used this data to test the predictive ability of the existing response models. Light sources differed in overall attractiveness to insects and relative attractiveness was dependent on insect order. The attraction patterns predicted by the two models correlated weakly with the number of insects attracted when the only light source rich in UV, a mercury vapour light, was included in the tested spectra. When the mercury vapour light, which is going to be banned in Europe, was not included in the test no correlation was found between predicted and observed attraction patterns. We conclude that currently existing attraction response models are insufficiently sensitive to evaluate new light sources.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 225-231 |
Journal | Journal of Insect Conservation |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Keywords
- artificial-light
- compound eyes
- color-vision
- moths
- attraction
- pollution
- drosophila
- diptera
- state
- trap