Soil-based, field-specific fertilizer recommendations are a pipe-dream

A.G.T. Schut*, K.E. Giller

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fertilizer recommendations are key for farmers: the investment is relatively large for smallholders and risky with unknown yield responses and variable fertilizer prices. Are agronomists able to provide useful site-specific fertilizer recommendations that reduce these uncertainties? We evaluated the influence of errors introduced due to soil sampling and chemical analysis procedures both within- and among laboratories on fertilizer recommendations. Using what we consider to be conservative estimates of the uncertainty in estimating soil supply of N, P and K in a single composite soil sample, the resulting 90% confidence interval of fertilizer recommendations ranged from 86 to 186, 0–58 and 38–114 kg N, P and K ha−1 respectively. The numerous laboratory services and digital applications providing field-specific recommendations appear to promise more accuracy than soil analysis can realistically deliver. We conclude that a field-specific fertilizer recommendation based on a single composite soil sample is indeed a pipe-dream.

Original languageEnglish
Article number114680
JournalGeoderma
Volume380
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2020

Keywords

  • Agronomic efficiency
  • Laboratory errors
  • QUEFTS
  • Soil analysis
  • Soil nutrients

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Soil-based, field-specific fertilizer recommendations are a pipe-dream'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this