Social learning–oriented capacity–building for critical transitions towards sustainability

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using two reviews of the United Nations Decade on Education for Sustainable Development (DESD) and a special report on social learning–based ESD prepared for the end of the DESD conference as a backdrop (Wals, Review of contexts and structures for ESD. UNESCO, Paris, 2009a; Wals, J Educ Sustain Dev 3(2):195–204, 2009b; Wals, Shaping the education of tomorrow: 2012 full–length report on the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. UNESCO, Paris, 2012.; Wals et al. Social learning–oriented ESD: meanings, challenges, practices and prospects for the post–DESD era. UNESCO, Paris, 2014) this chapter argues that, in order to address prevailing unsustainability, citizens, young and old, need to become active participants in transitions that break with hegemonic routines founded on untenable principles and values. A key learning challenge is that, although we have quite a good sense of what is ‘unsustainable’, we have little certainty about what in the end will prove to be sustainable. In fact we will never have such certainty. It can be argued that the essence of sustainably lies in the ability to respond, reflect, rethink and recalibrate, and not just once but periodically when changing circumstances demand us to do so. To complicate things further: how this is done and to what kind of society (school, neighbourhood, company, city, etc.) this will lead, will be different from place to place as no situation is identical. Sustainability as such is not a destiny or a way of behaving that can be transferred or trained but rather a capacity for critical thinking, reflexivity and transformation. The DESD reviews show that much ‘work’ is being done around the world under the umbrella of ESD but that this capacity is hardly emphasised or developed in practice. As such, ESD unwillingly runs the risk of replicating systems and lifestyles that are inherently unsustainable. This chapter will introduce social learning as a way to utilise diversity in generating creative routine–braking alternatives. Some concrete examples of social learning at the interface of school and community, at the interface of science and society, in the context of local and regional development and within policy making and governance are provided. Special attention is given to the problematic of assessing the impact of social learning.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSchooling for Sustainable Development in Europe: Concepts, Policies and Educational Experiences at the End of the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages87-107
Volumepart I
ISBN (Print)9783319095486
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Publication series

NameSchooling for Sustainable Development
Volume6

Fingerprint

sustainability
education
UNESCO
sustainable development
social learning
learning
UNO
reflexivity
United Nations
regional development
policy making
lifestyle
school
governance
citizen
demand
ability
science
community
Values

Cite this

Wals, A. E. J. (2015). Social learning–oriented capacity–building for critical transitions towards sustainability. In Schooling for Sustainable Development in Europe: Concepts, Policies and Educational Experiences at the End of the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (Vol. part I, pp. 87-107). (Schooling for Sustainable Development; Vol. 6). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09549-3_6
Wals, A.E.J. / Social learning–oriented capacity–building for critical transitions towards sustainability. Schooling for Sustainable Development in Europe: Concepts, Policies and Educational Experiences at the End of the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. Vol. part I Springer International Publishing, 2015. pp. 87-107 (Schooling for Sustainable Development).
@inbook{b9b1a33807304200b8e38ba9d91d3db5,
title = "Social learning–oriented capacity–building for critical transitions towards sustainability",
abstract = "Using two reviews of the United Nations Decade on Education for Sustainable Development (DESD) and a special report on social learning–based ESD prepared for the end of the DESD conference as a backdrop (Wals, Review of contexts and structures for ESD. UNESCO, Paris, 2009a; Wals, J Educ Sustain Dev 3(2):195–204, 2009b; Wals, Shaping the education of tomorrow: 2012 full–length report on the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. UNESCO, Paris, 2012.; Wals et al. Social learning–oriented ESD: meanings, challenges, practices and prospects for the post–DESD era. UNESCO, Paris, 2014) this chapter argues that, in order to address prevailing unsustainability, citizens, young and old, need to become active participants in transitions that break with hegemonic routines founded on untenable principles and values. A key learning challenge is that, although we have quite a good sense of what is ‘unsustainable’, we have little certainty about what in the end will prove to be sustainable. In fact we will never have such certainty. It can be argued that the essence of sustainably lies in the ability to respond, reflect, rethink and recalibrate, and not just once but periodically when changing circumstances demand us to do so. To complicate things further: how this is done and to what kind of society (school, neighbourhood, company, city, etc.) this will lead, will be different from place to place as no situation is identical. Sustainability as such is not a destiny or a way of behaving that can be transferred or trained but rather a capacity for critical thinking, reflexivity and transformation. The DESD reviews show that much ‘work’ is being done around the world under the umbrella of ESD but that this capacity is hardly emphasised or developed in practice. As such, ESD unwillingly runs the risk of replicating systems and lifestyles that are inherently unsustainable. This chapter will introduce social learning as a way to utilise diversity in generating creative routine–braking alternatives. Some concrete examples of social learning at the interface of school and community, at the interface of science and society, in the context of local and regional development and within policy making and governance are provided. Special attention is given to the problematic of assessing the impact of social learning.",
author = "A.E.J. Wals",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-09549-3_6",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319095486",
volume = "part I",
series = "Schooling for Sustainable Development",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",
pages = "87--107",
booktitle = "Schooling for Sustainable Development in Europe: Concepts, Policies and Educational Experiences at the End of the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development",

}

Wals, AEJ 2015, Social learning–oriented capacity–building for critical transitions towards sustainability. in Schooling for Sustainable Development in Europe: Concepts, Policies and Educational Experiences at the End of the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. vol. part I, Schooling for Sustainable Development, vol. 6, Springer International Publishing, pp. 87-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09549-3_6

Social learning–oriented capacity–building for critical transitions towards sustainability. / Wals, A.E.J.

Schooling for Sustainable Development in Europe: Concepts, Policies and Educational Experiences at the End of the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. Vol. part I Springer International Publishing, 2015. p. 87-107 (Schooling for Sustainable Development; Vol. 6).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Social learning–oriented capacity–building for critical transitions towards sustainability

AU - Wals, A.E.J.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Using two reviews of the United Nations Decade on Education for Sustainable Development (DESD) and a special report on social learning–based ESD prepared for the end of the DESD conference as a backdrop (Wals, Review of contexts and structures for ESD. UNESCO, Paris, 2009a; Wals, J Educ Sustain Dev 3(2):195–204, 2009b; Wals, Shaping the education of tomorrow: 2012 full–length report on the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. UNESCO, Paris, 2012.; Wals et al. Social learning–oriented ESD: meanings, challenges, practices and prospects for the post–DESD era. UNESCO, Paris, 2014) this chapter argues that, in order to address prevailing unsustainability, citizens, young and old, need to become active participants in transitions that break with hegemonic routines founded on untenable principles and values. A key learning challenge is that, although we have quite a good sense of what is ‘unsustainable’, we have little certainty about what in the end will prove to be sustainable. In fact we will never have such certainty. It can be argued that the essence of sustainably lies in the ability to respond, reflect, rethink and recalibrate, and not just once but periodically when changing circumstances demand us to do so. To complicate things further: how this is done and to what kind of society (school, neighbourhood, company, city, etc.) this will lead, will be different from place to place as no situation is identical. Sustainability as such is not a destiny or a way of behaving that can be transferred or trained but rather a capacity for critical thinking, reflexivity and transformation. The DESD reviews show that much ‘work’ is being done around the world under the umbrella of ESD but that this capacity is hardly emphasised or developed in practice. As such, ESD unwillingly runs the risk of replicating systems and lifestyles that are inherently unsustainable. This chapter will introduce social learning as a way to utilise diversity in generating creative routine–braking alternatives. Some concrete examples of social learning at the interface of school and community, at the interface of science and society, in the context of local and regional development and within policy making and governance are provided. Special attention is given to the problematic of assessing the impact of social learning.

AB - Using two reviews of the United Nations Decade on Education for Sustainable Development (DESD) and a special report on social learning–based ESD prepared for the end of the DESD conference as a backdrop (Wals, Review of contexts and structures for ESD. UNESCO, Paris, 2009a; Wals, J Educ Sustain Dev 3(2):195–204, 2009b; Wals, Shaping the education of tomorrow: 2012 full–length report on the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. UNESCO, Paris, 2012.; Wals et al. Social learning–oriented ESD: meanings, challenges, practices and prospects for the post–DESD era. UNESCO, Paris, 2014) this chapter argues that, in order to address prevailing unsustainability, citizens, young and old, need to become active participants in transitions that break with hegemonic routines founded on untenable principles and values. A key learning challenge is that, although we have quite a good sense of what is ‘unsustainable’, we have little certainty about what in the end will prove to be sustainable. In fact we will never have such certainty. It can be argued that the essence of sustainably lies in the ability to respond, reflect, rethink and recalibrate, and not just once but periodically when changing circumstances demand us to do so. To complicate things further: how this is done and to what kind of society (school, neighbourhood, company, city, etc.) this will lead, will be different from place to place as no situation is identical. Sustainability as such is not a destiny or a way of behaving that can be transferred or trained but rather a capacity for critical thinking, reflexivity and transformation. The DESD reviews show that much ‘work’ is being done around the world under the umbrella of ESD but that this capacity is hardly emphasised or developed in practice. As such, ESD unwillingly runs the risk of replicating systems and lifestyles that are inherently unsustainable. This chapter will introduce social learning as a way to utilise diversity in generating creative routine–braking alternatives. Some concrete examples of social learning at the interface of school and community, at the interface of science and society, in the context of local and regional development and within policy making and governance are provided. Special attention is given to the problematic of assessing the impact of social learning.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-09549-3_6

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-09549-3_6

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319095486

VL - part I

T3 - Schooling for Sustainable Development

SP - 87

EP - 107

BT - Schooling for Sustainable Development in Europe: Concepts, Policies and Educational Experiences at the End of the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -

Wals AEJ. Social learning–oriented capacity–building for critical transitions towards sustainability. In Schooling for Sustainable Development in Europe: Concepts, Policies and Educational Experiences at the End of the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. Vol. part I. Springer International Publishing. 2015. p. 87-107. (Schooling for Sustainable Development). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09549-3_6