"Smart regulation": Can policy instrument design solve forest policy aims of expansion and sustainability in Flanders and the Netherlands?

P. Van Gossum, B.J.M. Arts, K. Verheyen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current study investigates with a multiple case study the relation between instrument design and policy success. The conclusion is that the instrument mix matters. The Flemish interventionist approach, which focuses more on traditional instruments, was not as effective as the Dutch stimulating approach, which uses a broad pallet of social and economic instruments, including many new environmental policy instruments. It is conspicuous that the government remains the most important regulator in all cases, although the importance of surrogate regulators is growing. Mostly the government is needed to stimulate or even create such surrogate regulators. Therefore, the government has a key position to decide which regulatory tasks will be transferred to surrogate regulators. This is currently restricted to capacity-building and certification.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-34
JournalForest Policy and Economics
Volume16
Issue numberMarch
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • biodiversity conservation
  • environmental-policy
  • united-states
  • land-use
  • governance
  • management
  • certification
  • conflicts
  • education
  • programs

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of '"Smart regulation": Can policy instrument design solve forest policy aims of expansion and sustainability in Flanders and the Netherlands?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this