TY - JOUR
T1 - Small farms and development in sub-Saharan Africa
T2 - Farming for food, for income or for lack of better options?
AU - Giller, Ken E.
AU - Delaune, Thomas
AU - Silva, João Vasco
AU - van Wijk, Mark
AU - Hammond, James
AU - Descheemaeker, Katrien
AU - van de Ven, Gerrie
AU - Schut, Antonius G.T.
AU - Taulya, Godfrey
AU - Chikowo, Regis
AU - Andersson, Jens A.
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) for funding much of the data analysis as part of the Towards Inclusive, Sustainable, Nutritious and Efficient Food Systems project. KEG thanks the NWO-WOTRO Strategic Partnership NL-CGIAR for funding. JA acknowledges funding from the CRP on Maize through the CIMMYT grant 'Rural livelihood-oriented research methodologies for social impact analyses of Sustainable Intensification interventions’ project. JH acknowledges funding from USAID Feed the Future-AfricaRISING Ethiopia and JH and MvW the CGIAR Research Program on Livestock. We thank Rhett Harrison for permission to use RHoMIS data from Malawi collected by the NORAD-funded ‘Developing smallholder strategies for fall armyworm management in southern Africa’ project implemented jointly by ICRAF and Department of Agricultural Research, Malawi, Jordan Chamberlin for sharing data on available cropland at country level in sub-Saharan Africa and Bastiaen Boekelo for preparing Fig. .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Most food in sub-Saharan Africa is produced on small farms. Using large datasets from household surveys conducted across many countries, we find that the majority of farms are less than 1 ha, much smaller than previous estimates. Farms are larger in farming systems in drier climates. Through a detailed analysis of food self-sufficiency, food and nutrition security, and income among households from divergent farming systems in Ethiopia, Ghana, Mali, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda, we reveal marked contrasts in food security and household incomes. In the south of Mali, where cotton is an important cash crop, almost all households are food secure, and almost half earn a living income. Yet, in a similar agroecological environment in northern Ghana, only 10% of households are food secure and none earn a living income. Surprisingly, the extent of food insecurity and poverty is almost as great in densely-populated locations in the Ethiopian and Tanzanian highlands that are characterised by much better soils and two cropping seasons a year. Where populations are less dense, such as in South-west Uganda, a larger proportion of the households are food self-sufficient and poverty is less prevalent. In densely-populated Central Malawi, a combination of a single cropping season a year and small farms results in a strong incidence of food insecurity and poverty. These examples reveal a strong interplay between population density, farm size, market access, and agroecological potential on food security and household incomes. Within each location, farm size is a major determinant of food self-sufficiency and a household’s ability to rise above the living income threshold. Closing yield gaps strongly increases the proportion of households that are food self-sufficient. Yet in four of the locations (Ethiopia, Tanzania, Ghana and Malawi), land is so constraining that only 42–53% of households achieve food self-sufficiency, and even when yield gaps are closed only a small proportion of households can achieve a living income. While farming remains of central importance to household food security and income, our results help to explain why off-farm employment is a must for many. We discuss these results in relation to sub-Saharan Africa’s increasing population, likely agricultural expansion, and agriculture’s role in future economic development.
AB - Most food in sub-Saharan Africa is produced on small farms. Using large datasets from household surveys conducted across many countries, we find that the majority of farms are less than 1 ha, much smaller than previous estimates. Farms are larger in farming systems in drier climates. Through a detailed analysis of food self-sufficiency, food and nutrition security, and income among households from divergent farming systems in Ethiopia, Ghana, Mali, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda, we reveal marked contrasts in food security and household incomes. In the south of Mali, where cotton is an important cash crop, almost all households are food secure, and almost half earn a living income. Yet, in a similar agroecological environment in northern Ghana, only 10% of households are food secure and none earn a living income. Surprisingly, the extent of food insecurity and poverty is almost as great in densely-populated locations in the Ethiopian and Tanzanian highlands that are characterised by much better soils and two cropping seasons a year. Where populations are less dense, such as in South-west Uganda, a larger proportion of the households are food self-sufficient and poverty is less prevalent. In densely-populated Central Malawi, a combination of a single cropping season a year and small farms results in a strong incidence of food insecurity and poverty. These examples reveal a strong interplay between population density, farm size, market access, and agroecological potential on food security and household incomes. Within each location, farm size is a major determinant of food self-sufficiency and a household’s ability to rise above the living income threshold. Closing yield gaps strongly increases the proportion of households that are food self-sufficient. Yet in four of the locations (Ethiopia, Tanzania, Ghana and Malawi), land is so constraining that only 42–53% of households achieve food self-sufficiency, and even when yield gaps are closed only a small proportion of households can achieve a living income. While farming remains of central importance to household food security and income, our results help to explain why off-farm employment is a must for many. We discuss these results in relation to sub-Saharan Africa’s increasing population, likely agricultural expansion, and agriculture’s role in future economic development.
KW - Agroecological zones
KW - Farm size
KW - Living income
KW - Sustainable intensification
KW - Yield gaps
U2 - 10.1007/s12571-021-01209-0
DO - 10.1007/s12571-021-01209-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85117090858
VL - 13
SP - 1431
EP - 1454
JO - Food Security
JF - Food Security
SN - 1876-4517
IS - 6
ER -