Six Guiding Principles for Evaluating Mode-2 Strategies for Sustainable Development

B.J. Regeer, A.C. Hoes, M. van Amstel, J.F. Caron-Flinterman, J.F.G. Bunders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

new generation of public programs emerges, which specifically addresses complex societal problems we witness today. Programs for these types of complex issues—in this article, we consider more closely the challenge of sustainable development—are characterized by emergent design, learning processes between diverse actors, and adaptive management. Managers of these kinds of programs have new demands for evaluation and evaluators. This article describes prevailing evaluation methods for sustainable development (progress assessment, goal-oriented program evaluation, and program theory evaluation) and the challenges they meet when confronted with the complexity of designing and conducting systemic intervention programs for sustainable development. The evaluation framework that we propose offers guiding principles to assist evaluators in evaluating complex programs
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)515-537
JournalAmerican Journal of Evaluation
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Keywords

  • sustainable development
  • change
  • evaluation
  • methodology
  • program theory
  • science
  • indicators
  • paradox

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Six Guiding Principles for Evaluating Mode-2 Strategies for Sustainable Development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this