Site-specific management of miscanthus genotypes for combustion and anaerobic digestion: A comparison of energy yields

Andreas Kiesel*, Christopher Nunn, Yasir Iqbal, Tim Van der Weijde, Moritz Wagner, Mensure Özgüven, Ivan Tarakanov, Olena Kalinina, Luisa M. Trindade, John Clifton-Brown, Iris Lewandowski

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Europe, the perennial C4 grass miscanthus is currently mainly cultivated for energy generation via combustion. In recent years, anaerobic digestion has been identified as a promising alternative utilization pathway. Anaerobic digestion produces a higher-value intermediate (biogas), which can be upgraded to biomethane, stored in the existing natural gas infrastructure and further utilized as a transport fuel or in combined heat and power plants. However, the upgrading of the solid biomass into gaseous fuel leads to conversion-related energy losses, the level of which depends on the cultivation parameters genotype, location, and harvest date. Thus, site-specific crop management needs to be adapted to the intended utilization pathway. The objectives of this paper are to quantify (i) the impact of genotype, location and harvest date on energy yields of anaerobic digestion and combustion and (ii) the conversion losses of upgrading solid biomass into biogas. For this purpose, five miscanthus genotypes (OPM 3, 6, 9, 11, 14), three cultivation locations (Adana, Moscow, Stuttgart), and up to six harvest dates (August-March) were assessed. Anaerobic digestion yielded, on average, 35% less energy than combustion. Genotype, location, and harvest date all had significant impacts on the energy yield. For both, this is determined by dry matter yield and ash content and additionally by substrate-specific methane yield for anaerobic digestion and moisture content for combustion. Averaged over all locations and genotypes, an early harvest in August led to 25%and a late harvest to 45%conversion losses. However, each utilization option has its own optimal harvest date, determined by biomass yield, biomass quality, and cutting tolerance. By applying an autumn green harvest for anaerobic digestion and a delayed harvest for combustion, the conversion-related energy loss was reduced to an average of 18%. This clearly shows that the delayed harvest required tomaintain biomass quality for combustion is accompanied by high energy losses through yield reduction over winter. The pre-winter harvest applied in the biogas utilization pathway avoids these yield losses and largely compensates for the conversion-related energy losses of anaerobic digestion.
Original languageEnglish
Article number347
JournalFrontiers in Plant Science
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Biogas
  • Biomass
  • Energy yield
  • Harvest time
  • Moisture content
  • Substrate-specific methane yield
  • Yield

Cite this

Kiesel, A., Nunn, C., Iqbal, Y., Van der Weijde, T., Wagner, M., Özgüven, M., ... Lewandowski, I. (2017). Site-specific management of miscanthus genotypes for combustion and anaerobic digestion: A comparison of energy yields. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, [347]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00347