Shrinking geographies or challenged rurality’s? Three points of reflection – commentary to Syssner

M. Meijer*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademic

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

By asking ‘what could geographers do for shrinking geographies’ Josefina Syssner offers a very comprehensive overview of what has been and should be on the research agenda’s for understanding rural shrinking geographies. In this commentary I would like to address three issues related to the Fennia keynote, that may add an additional perspective or a moment of reflection: 1) the issue of demographic change, rather than shrinkage, 2) how we can imagine the future of shrinking geographies, and 3) what Nordic perspectives have to offer. In conclusion, I believe that peripheral geographies, and challenged rurality’s deserve a key position within geography and related disciplines, and call for a repolitisation of the topic: what we research, how we conceptualise or even advice has consequences for those living and imagining futures in peripheral, rural and depopulating regions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251–254
Number of pages4
JournalFennia: International Journal of Geography
Volume200
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2022

Keywords

  • shrinkage
  • critical geography
  • future
  • rural geography
  • Nordic perspectives

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Shrinking geographies or challenged rurality’s? Three points of reflection – commentary to Syssner'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this