Sharing reasoning behind individual decisions to invest in joint infrastructure

Melle J. Nikkels*, Joseph H.A. Guillaume, Peat Leith, Petra J.G.J. Hellegers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Development of joint irrigation infrastructure increasingly depends on investment decisions made by individual farmers. Farmers base their decisions to invest on their current knowledge and understanding. As irrigation infrastructure development is ultimately a group decision, it is beneficial if individuals have a common understanding of the various values at stake. Sharing the personal reasoning behind individual decisions is a promising approach to build such common understanding. This study demonstrates application of participatory crossover analysis at a workshop in Tasmania, Australia. The workshop gave farmers the opportunity to discuss their broader considerations in investment decisions, beyond just financial or monetary factors. It centered on the question, "In what conditions would you-the individual farmer-invest?" The participants' willingness to pay, in the form of crossover points, was presented as a set of scenarios to start an explorative discussion between irrigators and non-irrigators. Evaluation feedback indicates that the workshop enabled participants to share new information, improved understanding of differences between neighbors, and generated more respect for others and their decisions. As expected, reasoning went beyond economic concerns, and changed over time. Lifestyle choices, long-term intergenerational planning, perceived risks, and intrinsic motivations emerged as factors influencing water valuation. Simply having a facilitated discussion about the reasons underlying individuals' willingness to pay seems to be a useful tool for better informed decision-making about joint irrigation infrastructure, and is worth testing in further case studies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number798
JournalWater (Switzerland)
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Irrigation
infrastructure
Joints
farmers
farmer
irrigation
willingness to pay
Education
Tasmania
risk perception
Decision making
infrastructure development
group decision
intrinsic motivation
lifestyle
Feedback
Life Style
Motivation
Planning
decision making

Keywords

  • Irrigation
  • Participatory crossover analysis
  • Water resources management
  • Water valuation
  • Willingness to pay (WTP)

Cite this

@article{bcbd0271e9aa4fef97c1f7c41b5a4276,
title = "Sharing reasoning behind individual decisions to invest in joint infrastructure",
abstract = "Development of joint irrigation infrastructure increasingly depends on investment decisions made by individual farmers. Farmers base their decisions to invest on their current knowledge and understanding. As irrigation infrastructure development is ultimately a group decision, it is beneficial if individuals have a common understanding of the various values at stake. Sharing the personal reasoning behind individual decisions is a promising approach to build such common understanding. This study demonstrates application of participatory crossover analysis at a workshop in Tasmania, Australia. The workshop gave farmers the opportunity to discuss their broader considerations in investment decisions, beyond just financial or monetary factors. It centered on the question, {"}In what conditions would you-the individual farmer-invest?{"} The participants' willingness to pay, in the form of crossover points, was presented as a set of scenarios to start an explorative discussion between irrigators and non-irrigators. Evaluation feedback indicates that the workshop enabled participants to share new information, improved understanding of differences between neighbors, and generated more respect for others and their decisions. As expected, reasoning went beyond economic concerns, and changed over time. Lifestyle choices, long-term intergenerational planning, perceived risks, and intrinsic motivations emerged as factors influencing water valuation. Simply having a facilitated discussion about the reasons underlying individuals' willingness to pay seems to be a useful tool for better informed decision-making about joint irrigation infrastructure, and is worth testing in further case studies.",
keywords = "Irrigation, Participatory crossover analysis, Water resources management, Water valuation, Willingness to pay (WTP)",
author = "Nikkels, {Melle J.} and Guillaume, {Joseph H.A.} and Peat Leith and Hellegers, {Petra J.G.J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/w11040798",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Water",
issn = "2073-4441",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "4",

}

Sharing reasoning behind individual decisions to invest in joint infrastructure. / Nikkels, Melle J.; Guillaume, Joseph H.A.; Leith, Peat; Hellegers, Petra J.G.J.

In: Water (Switzerland), Vol. 11, No. 4, 798, 01.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sharing reasoning behind individual decisions to invest in joint infrastructure

AU - Nikkels, Melle J.

AU - Guillaume, Joseph H.A.

AU - Leith, Peat

AU - Hellegers, Petra J.G.J.

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Development of joint irrigation infrastructure increasingly depends on investment decisions made by individual farmers. Farmers base their decisions to invest on their current knowledge and understanding. As irrigation infrastructure development is ultimately a group decision, it is beneficial if individuals have a common understanding of the various values at stake. Sharing the personal reasoning behind individual decisions is a promising approach to build such common understanding. This study demonstrates application of participatory crossover analysis at a workshop in Tasmania, Australia. The workshop gave farmers the opportunity to discuss their broader considerations in investment decisions, beyond just financial or monetary factors. It centered on the question, "In what conditions would you-the individual farmer-invest?" The participants' willingness to pay, in the form of crossover points, was presented as a set of scenarios to start an explorative discussion between irrigators and non-irrigators. Evaluation feedback indicates that the workshop enabled participants to share new information, improved understanding of differences between neighbors, and generated more respect for others and their decisions. As expected, reasoning went beyond economic concerns, and changed over time. Lifestyle choices, long-term intergenerational planning, perceived risks, and intrinsic motivations emerged as factors influencing water valuation. Simply having a facilitated discussion about the reasons underlying individuals' willingness to pay seems to be a useful tool for better informed decision-making about joint irrigation infrastructure, and is worth testing in further case studies.

AB - Development of joint irrigation infrastructure increasingly depends on investment decisions made by individual farmers. Farmers base their decisions to invest on their current knowledge and understanding. As irrigation infrastructure development is ultimately a group decision, it is beneficial if individuals have a common understanding of the various values at stake. Sharing the personal reasoning behind individual decisions is a promising approach to build such common understanding. This study demonstrates application of participatory crossover analysis at a workshop in Tasmania, Australia. The workshop gave farmers the opportunity to discuss their broader considerations in investment decisions, beyond just financial or monetary factors. It centered on the question, "In what conditions would you-the individual farmer-invest?" The participants' willingness to pay, in the form of crossover points, was presented as a set of scenarios to start an explorative discussion between irrigators and non-irrigators. Evaluation feedback indicates that the workshop enabled participants to share new information, improved understanding of differences between neighbors, and generated more respect for others and their decisions. As expected, reasoning went beyond economic concerns, and changed over time. Lifestyle choices, long-term intergenerational planning, perceived risks, and intrinsic motivations emerged as factors influencing water valuation. Simply having a facilitated discussion about the reasons underlying individuals' willingness to pay seems to be a useful tool for better informed decision-making about joint irrigation infrastructure, and is worth testing in further case studies.

KW - Irrigation

KW - Participatory crossover analysis

KW - Water resources management

KW - Water valuation

KW - Willingness to pay (WTP)

U2 - 10.3390/w11040798

DO - 10.3390/w11040798

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - Water

JF - Water

SN - 2073-4441

IS - 4

M1 - 798

ER -