Sharing in or Benefiting from Scientific Advancement?

C.A. Timmermann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The intellectual property regimes we have currently in place are heavily under attack. One of the points of criticism is the interaction between two elements of article 27 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the widely discussed issue of being able to benefit from scientific progress and the less argued for position of having a right to take part in scientific enterprises. To shine light on the question if we should balance the two elements or prioritize one of them, an exploration will be offered on how benefiting from scientific progress and the ability to participate in the advancement of science relate to securing human capabilities. A different perspective to the question will be gained by identifying the problem as an issue of misrecognition, especially the failure to recognize many willing collaboration partners in scientific research as peers. Lastly, I will argue that cooperative justice requires that if we have an innovation incentive system that disproportionally benefits one particular group, a certain duty to counterbalance this advantage exists when we are relying on mutual cooperation for the recognition of intellectual property rights.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-133
JournalScience and Engineering Ethics
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • human-rights
  • science
  • resistance
  • equality
  • property
  • market
  • work
  • duty

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Sharing in or Benefiting from Scientific Advancement?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this