Sharing food and risk in Berlin's urban food commons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Public fridges are open-access community-stewarded spaces where food can be freely and anonymously shared. As such, they are fertile ground for understanding the obstacles and opportunities for governing food as a commons. This paper examines the governance strategies that have developed within and around Foodsharing.de, a grassroots food-rescue network in Berlin, to manage food as a commons. Analyzing the commoning of food in Foodsharing.de provides a novel entry point into the multi-scalar and multi-stakeholder governance processes that shape our broader food system. In this paper, I further develop the concept of urban food commons to specifically analyze the governance of food and risk. In particular, I draw on qualitative research to analyze a conflict between Foodsharing.de and the Berlin Food Safety Authority over the potential health and safety risks of public fridges. Building on this, I show how different governance practices, informed by different risk ontologies and understandings of the common good/hazard of food, come into tension through the everyday practices of sharing food. This paper departs from previous research that has focused on how the benefits of food commons are shared and regulated at various scales, to also explore how their risks are managed, or could be managed, within an urban food commons framework.

LanguageEnglish
Pages202-212
JournalGeoforum
Volume99
Early online date25 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Berlin
food
governance
common good
open access
ontology
qualitative research
stakeholder

Keywords

  • Berlin
  • Commons
  • Food sharing
  • Governance
  • Public fridges
  • Risk

Cite this

@article{aefc4dd3379c45d5809d2f51437d72a8,
title = "Sharing food and risk in Berlin's urban food commons",
abstract = "Public fridges are open-access community-stewarded spaces where food can be freely and anonymously shared. As such, they are fertile ground for understanding the obstacles and opportunities for governing food as a commons. This paper examines the governance strategies that have developed within and around Foodsharing.de, a grassroots food-rescue network in Berlin, to manage food as a commons. Analyzing the commoning of food in Foodsharing.de provides a novel entry point into the multi-scalar and multi-stakeholder governance processes that shape our broader food system. In this paper, I further develop the concept of urban food commons to specifically analyze the governance of food and risk. In particular, I draw on qualitative research to analyze a conflict between Foodsharing.de and the Berlin Food Safety Authority over the potential health and safety risks of public fridges. Building on this, I show how different governance practices, informed by different risk ontologies and understandings of the common good/hazard of food, come into tension through the everyday practices of sharing food. This paper departs from previous research that has focused on how the benefits of food commons are shared and regulated at various scales, to also explore how their risks are managed, or could be managed, within an urban food commons framework.",
keywords = "Berlin, Commons, Food sharing, Governance, Public fridges, Risk",
author = "Oona Morrow",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.09.003",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "202--212",
journal = "Geoforum",
issn = "0016-7185",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Sharing food and risk in Berlin's urban food commons. / Morrow, Oona.

In: Geoforum, Vol. 99, 02.2019, p. 202-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sharing food and risk in Berlin's urban food commons

AU - Morrow, Oona

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - Public fridges are open-access community-stewarded spaces where food can be freely and anonymously shared. As such, they are fertile ground for understanding the obstacles and opportunities for governing food as a commons. This paper examines the governance strategies that have developed within and around Foodsharing.de, a grassroots food-rescue network in Berlin, to manage food as a commons. Analyzing the commoning of food in Foodsharing.de provides a novel entry point into the multi-scalar and multi-stakeholder governance processes that shape our broader food system. In this paper, I further develop the concept of urban food commons to specifically analyze the governance of food and risk. In particular, I draw on qualitative research to analyze a conflict between Foodsharing.de and the Berlin Food Safety Authority over the potential health and safety risks of public fridges. Building on this, I show how different governance practices, informed by different risk ontologies and understandings of the common good/hazard of food, come into tension through the everyday practices of sharing food. This paper departs from previous research that has focused on how the benefits of food commons are shared and regulated at various scales, to also explore how their risks are managed, or could be managed, within an urban food commons framework.

AB - Public fridges are open-access community-stewarded spaces where food can be freely and anonymously shared. As such, they are fertile ground for understanding the obstacles and opportunities for governing food as a commons. This paper examines the governance strategies that have developed within and around Foodsharing.de, a grassroots food-rescue network in Berlin, to manage food as a commons. Analyzing the commoning of food in Foodsharing.de provides a novel entry point into the multi-scalar and multi-stakeholder governance processes that shape our broader food system. In this paper, I further develop the concept of urban food commons to specifically analyze the governance of food and risk. In particular, I draw on qualitative research to analyze a conflict between Foodsharing.de and the Berlin Food Safety Authority over the potential health and safety risks of public fridges. Building on this, I show how different governance practices, informed by different risk ontologies and understandings of the common good/hazard of food, come into tension through the everyday practices of sharing food. This paper departs from previous research that has focused on how the benefits of food commons are shared and regulated at various scales, to also explore how their risks are managed, or could be managed, within an urban food commons framework.

KW - Berlin

KW - Commons

KW - Food sharing

KW - Governance

KW - Public fridges

KW - Risk

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.09.003

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 202

EP - 212

JO - Geoforum

T2 - Geoforum

JF - Geoforum

SN - 0016-7185

ER -