Sexual selection studies: A NESCent catalyst meeting

J. Roughgarden, E. Adkins-Regan, E. Akcay, C.A. Hinde, T. Hoquet, C. O'Connor, Z.M. Prokop, R.O. Prum, S. Shafir, S.S. Snow, D. Taylor, J. Van Cleve, M. Weisberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

Abstract

A catalyst meeting on sexual selection studies was held in July 2013 at the facilities of the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent) in Durham, NC. This article by a subcommittee of the participants foregrounds some of the topics discussed at the meeting. Topics mentioned here include the relevance of heritability estimates to assessing the presence of sexual selection, whether sexual selection is distinct from natural selection, and the utility of distinguishing sexual selection from fecundity selection. A possible definition of sexual selection is offered based on a distinction between sexual selection as a frequency-dependent process and fecundity selection as a density-dependent process. Another topic highlighted is a deep disagreement among participants in the reality of good-genes, sexy-sons, and run-away processes. Finally, the status of conflict in political-economic theory is contrasted with the status accorded to conflict in evolutionary behavioral theory, and the professional responsibility of sexual-selection workers to consider the ethical dimension of their research is underscored.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere680v3
Number of pages15
JournalPeerJ PrePrints
Volume3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

political theory
economic theory
worker
responsibility

Cite this

Roughgarden, J., Adkins-Regan, E., Akcay, E., Hinde, C. A., Hoquet, T., O'Connor, C., ... Weisberg, M. (2015). Sexual selection studies: A NESCent catalyst meeting. PeerJ PrePrints, 3, [e680v3 ]. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.680v3
Roughgarden, J. ; Adkins-Regan, E. ; Akcay, E. ; Hinde, C.A. ; Hoquet, T. ; O'Connor, C. ; Prokop, Z.M. ; Prum, R.O. ; Shafir, S. ; Snow, S.S. ; Taylor, D. ; Van Cleve, J. ; Weisberg, M. / Sexual selection studies: A NESCent catalyst meeting. In: PeerJ PrePrints. 2015 ; Vol. 3.
@article{4ea8eb3afd43493ab4fdb279077e60c8,
title = "Sexual selection studies: A NESCent catalyst meeting",
abstract = "A catalyst meeting on sexual selection studies was held in July 2013 at the facilities of the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent) in Durham, NC. This article by a subcommittee of the participants foregrounds some of the topics discussed at the meeting. Topics mentioned here include the relevance of heritability estimates to assessing the presence of sexual selection, whether sexual selection is distinct from natural selection, and the utility of distinguishing sexual selection from fecundity selection. A possible definition of sexual selection is offered based on a distinction between sexual selection as a frequency-dependent process and fecundity selection as a density-dependent process. Another topic highlighted is a deep disagreement among participants in the reality of good-genes, sexy-sons, and run-away processes. Finally, the status of conflict in political-economic theory is contrasted with the status accorded to conflict in evolutionary behavioral theory, and the professional responsibility of sexual-selection workers to consider the ethical dimension of their research is underscored.",
author = "J. Roughgarden and E. Adkins-Regan and E. Akcay and C.A. Hinde and T. Hoquet and C. O'Connor and Z.M. Prokop and R.O. Prum and S. Shafir and S.S. Snow and D. Taylor and {Van Cleve}, J. and M. Weisberg",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.7287/peerj.preprints.680v3",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
journal = "PeerJ PrePrints",
issn = "2167-9843",
publisher = "PeerJ",

}

Roughgarden, J, Adkins-Regan, E, Akcay, E, Hinde, CA, Hoquet, T, O'Connor, C, Prokop, ZM, Prum, RO, Shafir, S, Snow, SS, Taylor, D, Van Cleve, J & Weisberg, M 2015, 'Sexual selection studies: A NESCent catalyst meeting', PeerJ PrePrints, vol. 3, e680v3 . https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.680v3

Sexual selection studies: A NESCent catalyst meeting. / Roughgarden, J.; Adkins-Regan, E.; Akcay, E.; Hinde, C.A.; Hoquet, T.; O'Connor, C.; Prokop, Z.M.; Prum, R.O.; Shafir, S.; Snow, S.S.; Taylor, D.; Van Cleve, J.; Weisberg, M.

In: PeerJ PrePrints, Vol. 3, e680v3 , 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sexual selection studies: A NESCent catalyst meeting

AU - Roughgarden, J.

AU - Adkins-Regan, E.

AU - Akcay, E.

AU - Hinde, C.A.

AU - Hoquet, T.

AU - O'Connor, C.

AU - Prokop, Z.M.

AU - Prum, R.O.

AU - Shafir, S.

AU - Snow, S.S.

AU - Taylor, D.

AU - Van Cleve, J.

AU - Weisberg, M.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - A catalyst meeting on sexual selection studies was held in July 2013 at the facilities of the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent) in Durham, NC. This article by a subcommittee of the participants foregrounds some of the topics discussed at the meeting. Topics mentioned here include the relevance of heritability estimates to assessing the presence of sexual selection, whether sexual selection is distinct from natural selection, and the utility of distinguishing sexual selection from fecundity selection. A possible definition of sexual selection is offered based on a distinction between sexual selection as a frequency-dependent process and fecundity selection as a density-dependent process. Another topic highlighted is a deep disagreement among participants in the reality of good-genes, sexy-sons, and run-away processes. Finally, the status of conflict in political-economic theory is contrasted with the status accorded to conflict in evolutionary behavioral theory, and the professional responsibility of sexual-selection workers to consider the ethical dimension of their research is underscored.

AB - A catalyst meeting on sexual selection studies was held in July 2013 at the facilities of the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent) in Durham, NC. This article by a subcommittee of the participants foregrounds some of the topics discussed at the meeting. Topics mentioned here include the relevance of heritability estimates to assessing the presence of sexual selection, whether sexual selection is distinct from natural selection, and the utility of distinguishing sexual selection from fecundity selection. A possible definition of sexual selection is offered based on a distinction between sexual selection as a frequency-dependent process and fecundity selection as a density-dependent process. Another topic highlighted is a deep disagreement among participants in the reality of good-genes, sexy-sons, and run-away processes. Finally, the status of conflict in political-economic theory is contrasted with the status accorded to conflict in evolutionary behavioral theory, and the professional responsibility of sexual-selection workers to consider the ethical dimension of their research is underscored.

U2 - 10.7287/peerj.preprints.680v3

DO - 10.7287/peerj.preprints.680v3

M3 - Article

VL - 3

JO - PeerJ PrePrints

JF - PeerJ PrePrints

SN - 2167-9843

M1 - e680v3

ER -

Roughgarden J, Adkins-Regan E, Akcay E, Hinde CA, Hoquet T, O'Connor C et al. Sexual selection studies: A NESCent catalyst meeting. PeerJ PrePrints. 2015;3. e680v3 . https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.680v3