Separation of racemic mixture by ultrafiltration of enantioselective micelles. 2 (De) complexation kinetics

P.E.M. Overdevest, M.A.I. Schutyser, T.J.M. de Bruin, K. van 't Riet, J.T.F. Keurentjes, A. van der Padt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The application of enantioselective micelles in ultrafiltration systems can be an alternative route to meet the increasing demand for enantiopure products. We have studied the separation of D,L-phenylalanine (Phe) by cholesteryl-L-glutamate:CuII (CLG:CuII) anchored in nonionic micelles (intrinsic enantioselectivity D/L,int = 1.9). A cascaded system is needed to complete the separation, as a single stage is insufficient to obtain >99␘ptically pure products. It is shown that the complexation and decomplexation processes are not instantaneous; hence, elucidation of the complexation kinetics is essential to the design of a multistage system. Linear driving force (LDF) models describe both the complexation and decomplexation rates of enantiomers. It can be concluded that the complexation rates of D- and L-Phe, (32 ± 11) x 10-5 s-1 and (28 ± 14) x 10-5 s-1, respectively, are not limited by enantiomer diffusion in the hydrophilic shell of the micelles. Consequently, the formation and rearrangement of the chelate complexes must be rate-limiting. In addition, decomplexation of both enantiomers is even slower, on the order of 10-6 s-1. Fortunately, ultrafiltration experiments indicate that a rapid exchange rate of bound L-Phe by unbound D-Phe improves the decomplexation of L-Phe to (360 ± 250) x 10-5 mM-1 s-1. This exchange process can be described by a second-order LDF model.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5998-6003
JournalIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Volume40
Issue number25
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Separation of racemic mixture by ultrafiltration of enantioselective micelles. 2 (De) complexation kinetics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this