Abstract
Abstract: As a way to mitigate climate change, ways to reduce electricity consumption are being explored. I claim Briggle and Mitcham’s experiential gap offers a useful framework to understand the workings of our environment regarding this consumption.
Via Foucauldian ethics, which holds people need to relate to their environment
through ‘self practices’ in order to make moral choices, I argue that the complex and
opaque electrical network makes it particularly difficult to consciously curb consumption.
Efforts to make the network simpler and more transparent could enable engagement
and ‘ethical consumption,’ but at the cost of decreased usability.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 94-104 |
| Journal | Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- Consumption
- Electricity
- Energy
- Experiential gap
- Foucauldian ethics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Self Practices and the Experiential Gap: An Analysis of Moral Behavior around Electricity Consumption'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver