Risk perception, Attitudes towards risk and risk management: Evidence and implications

Erwin Wauters*, Frankwin Van Winsen, Yann De Mey, Ludwig Lauwers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The comprehensive risk analysis of a business such as farming entails questions on what is at stake, how important is the risk concern and how to deal with it. We performed a sequential mixed method, with the in-depth interviews in the fi rst stage (n = 35), followed by a survey on the Flemish FADN (n = 614) in the second, to investigate the farmers’ risk perception, the attitudes towards risk and the perceived usefulness of the risk management strategies. We find that, rather than the short-term volatility in prices, the longer term co-evolution of expenses versus receipts is of a major concern to farmers, next to the land availability and the policy risks. Farmers are shown to be only slightly risk averse, rather risk neutral even. Further, our results suggest that farmers do not consider extensively studied risk management strategies such as contracts, futures and insurances, a valid option for their farm, and put more faith in internal strategies such as the debt management, the liquidity management and diversifi cation. Last, risk management is to a substantial degree performed at the household level, rather than at the farm level, with strategies such as cutting the private expenses and the off -farm employment. Th ese results hardly diff er according to the farm and farmer characteristics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)389-405
Number of pages17
JournalAgricultural Economics (Czech Republic)
Volume60
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • FADN
  • Mixed method
  • Perceptions
  • Risk
  • Risk attitudes
  • Risk management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Risk perception, Attitudes towards risk and risk management: Evidence and implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this