Results of activities to maintain landraces and other material in some European countries in situ before 1945 and what we may learn from them.

A.C. Zeven

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

All three recommendations to maintain landraces in European countries, given in 1927: 1. maintenance by 'traditional' farmers, 2. maintenance by school personnel and pupils, and 3. maintenance by small agricultural institutions, were disregarded. The present outcome: maintenance by genebanks, which often grow landraces and improved cultivars of one crop next to each other, and which often are part of a large agricultural research institute, was advised against. The above observation may be of value to those who at present advocate maintenance of landraces by 'traditional' farmers in developing countries. It is recommended that landraces should be collected and maintained in genebanks as this will result in a partial loss of the material, whereas on farm maintenance (in situ conservation) would lead to a complete loss.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-341
JournalGenetic Resources and Crop Evolution
Volume43
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1996

Keywords

  • genetic resources
  • history
  • in situ conservation
  • landrace conservation
  • on farm maintenance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Results of activities to maintain landraces and other material in some European countries in situ before 1945 and what we may learn from them.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this