Abstract
All three recommendations to maintain landraces in European countries, given in 1927: 1. maintenance by 'traditional' farmers, 2. maintenance by school personnel and pupils, and 3. maintenance by small agricultural institutions, were disregarded. The present outcome: maintenance by genebanks, which often grow landraces and improved cultivars of one crop next to each other, and which often are part of a large agricultural research institute, was advised against. The above observation may be of value to those who at present advocate maintenance of landraces by 'traditional' farmers in developing countries. It is recommended that landraces should be collected and maintained in genebanks as this will result in a partial loss of the material, whereas on farm maintenance (in situ conservation) would lead to a complete loss.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 337-341 |
Journal | Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution |
Volume | 43 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1996 |
Keywords
- genetic resources
- history
- in situ conservation
- landrace conservation
- on farm maintenance