Responses in sediment bioassays used in the Netherlands: can observed toxicity be explained by routinely monitored priority pollutants?

J. Lahr, J.L. Maas-Diepeveen, S.C. Stuijfzand, P.E.G. Leonards, J.M. Drueke, S. Luecker, A. Espeldoorn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In order to identify the cause of toxicity in sediments and suspended matter, a large number of samples with different degrees of contamination was taken at various locations in The Netherlands. Standard acute bioassays were carried out with the bacterium Vibrio fischeri, the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus and the anostracan Thamnocephalus platyurus. Chronic standard tests were performed using the water flea Daphnia magna and larvae of the midge Chironomus riparius. Some novel bioassays were performed as well. Most toxic effects observed in standard bioassays with sediments from polluted sediments (class 3 and 4 on a scale of 0¿4 according to the Dutch criteria) could be partly explained by toxic concentrations of known persistent priority pollutants, mainly heavy metals and occasionally polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. In some of the samples, ammonia toxicity was a confounding factor during testing. Suspended matter from the Meuse river at Eijsden, which may be considered as `new' sediment (pollution class 2), was moderately to highly toxic in almost all bioassays. This could have been associated with a combination of heavy metals, PAHs and ammonia. At two locations from the Lake IJssel area with no apparent persistent pollution, moderate and strong effects were nonetheless observed in invertebrate tests. This might have been due to agricultural run-off of pesticides, which are not routinely measured in sediments. A few effects on V. fischeri in canals and a small stream could not be explained with standard chemical analysis, but seemed associated with the outlets of sewage water treatment plants and industrial effluents. Additional chemical analysis of pore water samples from five selected sediments yielded more identified substances such as phtalates, decanes, cosanes and fragrances, but it was estimated that their contribution to the effects observed on V. fischeri, D. magna and C. riparius was negligible.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1691-1710
JournalWater Research
Volume37
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Keywords

  • bioassays
  • sediment
  • toxicity
  • monitoring
  • pollutants
  • deltas
  • netherlands
  • water pollution
  • water bottoms
  • river rhine
  • river meuse
  • quality criteria
  • daphnia-magna
  • rhine delta
  • water
  • tests
  • microcontaminants
  • fractionation
  • crustacea
  • chemicals
  • organisms

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Responses in sediment bioassays used in the Netherlands: can observed toxicity be explained by routinely monitored priority pollutants?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this