Response to commentary ‘towards more meaningful scenarios of biodiversity responses to land-use change in Central Asia

Sarahi Nunez*, Rob Alkemade, Kasper Kok, Rik Leemans

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademic

Abstract

With this letter, we respond to the commentary by Kamp et al. on our paper (Nunez et al. in Reg Environ Chang 20:39, 2020) that reports on potential biodiversity change in Central Asian grasslands using climate and land-use change scenarios. In their commentary, Kamp et al. criticize data and methods employed and discuss several shortfalls of our approach. In this response, we argue that in our paper projections of future biodiversity already acknowledge the issues indicated by Kamp et al. We elaborate on the reasons why. We maintain our main finding that, based on a number of contrasting scenarios (shared socioeconomic pathways and representative concentration pathways combinations), biodiversity in grasslands in Central Asia will potentially decline under each scenario. We conclude that while our data and methods conservatively estimate potential biodiversity changes in the Central Asian grasslands, they could be enriched with more elements. The results, however, are likely to confirm the vulnerability of these grasslands and the possible decline in their biodiversity.

Original languageEnglish
Article number80
JournalRegional Environmental Change
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2020

Keywords

  • Biodiversity change
  • Grasslands
  • Grazing intensification
  • Land-use scenarios

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Response to commentary ‘towards more meaningful scenarios of biodiversity responses to land-use change in Central Asia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this