Respondents' evaluation of the 24-h dietary recall method (EPIC-Soft) in the EFCOVAL Project

I. Huybrechts; A. Geelen; J.H.M. de Vries; C. Casagrande; G. Nicolas; W. de Keyzer; I.T.L. Lillegaard; J. Ruprich; L. Lafay; E.C. Wilson-van den Hooven; E.M. Niekerk; I. Margaritis; I. Rehurkova; S.P. Crispim; H. Freisling; S. de Henauw; N. Slimani

doi:10.1038/ejcn.2011.85

Respondents' evaluation of the 24-h dietary recall method (EPIC-Soft) in the EFCOVAL Project

I. Huybrechts, A. Geelen, J.H.M. de Vries, C. Casagrande, G. Nicolas, W. de Keyzer, I.T.L. Lillegaard, J. Ruprich, L. Lafay, E.C. Wilson-van den Hooven, E.M. Niekerk, I. Margaritis, I. Rehurkova, S.P. Crispim, H. Freisling, S. de Henauw, N. Slimani

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: To improve participation rate, accuracy and respondents’ compliance, it is important to know the respondents’ viewpoint. Objective: To evaluate respondents’ preferences and perception about the EPIC-Soft (the software developed to conduct 24-h dietary recalls (24-HDRs) in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study) 24-HDR interviews and to compare these preferences and perception between population groups (for example, between genders). Design: Data were collected in Belgium, Czech Republic, France, the Netherlands and Norway in 2007. Two 24-HDRs (face-to-face and telephone administered) were conducted using EPIC-Soft. An evaluation questionnaire on different study aspects was completed by the respondents. Setting: Data were collected in the European Food Consumption Validation Study. Subjects: A convenience sample of 600 apparently healthy men and women, 45–65 years old and including all educational levels, were recruited (120 subjects per country). Differences among population groups were compared by means of the ¿ 2-test. Results: A total of 585 respondents completed the evaluation questionnaire. In all, 88% experienced problems only to a low degree when answering face-to-face and telephone-administered 24-HDR using EPIC-Soft. A total of 15% would have preferred help of another person during the face-to-face interview in the study center (mainly men: P

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	S29-S37
Journal	European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume	65
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.85
Publication status	Published - 2011

Keywords

multiple-pass method
validation
children
accuracy
centers

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1038/ejcn.2011.85

Cite this

Huybrechts, I., Geelen, A., de Vries, J. H. M., Casagrande, C., Nicolas, G., de Keyzer, W., Lillegaard, I. T. L., Ruprich, J., Lafay, L., Wilson-van den Hooven, E. C., Niekerk, E. M., Margaritis, I., Rehurkova, I., Crispim, S. P., Freisling, H., de Henauw, S., & Slimani, N. (2011). Respondents' evaluation of the 24-h dietary recall method (EPIC-Soft) in the EFCOVAL Project. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 65, S29-S37. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.85

@article{3c16e60641534a63b892625505d8198d,

title = "Respondents' evaluation of the 24-h dietary recall method (EPIC-Soft) in the EFCOVAL Project",

abstract = "Background: To improve participation rate, accuracy and respondents{\textquoteright} compliance, it is important to know the respondents{\textquoteright} viewpoint. Objective: To evaluate respondents{\textquoteright} preferences and perception about the EPIC-Soft (the software developed to conduct 24-h dietary recalls (24-HDRs) in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study) 24-HDR interviews and to compare these preferences and perception between population groups (for example, between genders). Design: Data were collected in Belgium, Czech Republic, France, the Netherlands and Norway in 2007. Two 24-HDRs (face-to-face and telephone administered) were conducted using EPIC-Soft. An evaluation questionnaire on different study aspects was completed by the respondents. Setting: Data were collected in the European Food Consumption Validation Study. Subjects: A convenience sample of 600 apparently healthy men and women, 45–65 years old and including all educational levels, were recruited (120 subjects per country). Differences among population groups were compared by means of the ¿ 2-test. Results: A total of 585 respondents completed the evaluation questionnaire. In all, 88% experienced problems only to a low degree when answering face-to-face and telephone-administered 24-HDR using EPIC-Soft. A total of 15% would have preferred help of another person during the face-to-face interview in the study center (mainly men: P",

keywords = "multiple-pass method, validation, children, accuracy, centers",

author = "I. Huybrechts and A. Geelen and {de Vries}, J.H.M. and C. Casagrande and G. Nicolas and {de Keyzer}, W. and I.T.L. Lillegaard and J. Ruprich and L. Lafay and {Wilson-van den Hooven}, E.C. and E.M. Niekerk and I. Margaritis and I. Rehurkova and S.P. Crispim and H. Freisling and {de Henauw}, S. and N. Slimani",

year = "2011",

doi = "10.1038/ejcn.2011.85",

language = "English",

volume = "65",

pages = "S29--S37",

journal = "European Journal of Clinical Nutrition",

issn = "0954-3007",

publisher = "Nature",

}

Huybrechts, I, Geelen, A , de Vries, JHM, Casagrande, C, Nicolas, G, de Keyzer, W, Lillegaard, ITL, Ruprich, J, Lafay, L, Wilson-van den Hooven, EC, Niekerk, EM, Margaritis, I, Rehurkova, I, Crispim, SP, Freisling, H, de Henauw, S & Slimani, N 2011, 'Respondents' evaluation of the 24-h dietary recall method (EPIC-Soft) in the EFCOVAL Project', European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 65, pp. S29-S37. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.85

TY - JOUR

T1 - Respondents' evaluation of the 24-h dietary recall method (EPIC-Soft) in the EFCOVAL Project

AU - Huybrechts, I.

AU - Geelen, A.

AU - de Vries, J.H.M.

AU - Casagrande, C.

AU - Nicolas, G.

AU - de Keyzer, W.

AU - Lillegaard, I.T.L.

AU - Ruprich, J.

AU - Lafay, L.

AU - Wilson-van den Hooven, E.C.

AU - Niekerk, E.M.

AU - Margaritis, I.

AU - Rehurkova, I.

AU - Crispim, S.P.

AU - Freisling, H.

AU - de Henauw, S.

AU - Slimani, N.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Background: To improve participation rate, accuracy and respondents’ compliance, it is important to know the respondents’ viewpoint. Objective: To evaluate respondents’ preferences and perception about the EPIC-Soft (the software developed to conduct 24-h dietary recalls (24-HDRs) in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study) 24-HDR interviews and to compare these preferences and perception between population groups (for example, between genders). Design: Data were collected in Belgium, Czech Republic, France, the Netherlands and Norway in 2007. Two 24-HDRs (face-to-face and telephone administered) were conducted using EPIC-Soft. An evaluation questionnaire on different study aspects was completed by the respondents. Setting: Data were collected in the European Food Consumption Validation Study. Subjects: A convenience sample of 600 apparently healthy men and women, 45–65 years old and including all educational levels, were recruited (120 subjects per country). Differences among population groups were compared by means of the ¿ 2-test. Results: A total of 585 respondents completed the evaluation questionnaire. In all, 88% experienced problems only to a low degree when answering face-to-face and telephone-administered 24-HDR using EPIC-Soft. A total of 15% would have preferred help of another person during the face-to-face interview in the study center (mainly men: P

AB - Background: To improve participation rate, accuracy and respondents’ compliance, it is important to know the respondents’ viewpoint. Objective: To evaluate respondents’ preferences and perception about the EPIC-Soft (the software developed to conduct 24-h dietary recalls (24-HDRs) in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study) 24-HDR interviews and to compare these preferences and perception between population groups (for example, between genders). Design: Data were collected in Belgium, Czech Republic, France, the Netherlands and Norway in 2007. Two 24-HDRs (face-to-face and telephone administered) were conducted using EPIC-Soft. An evaluation questionnaire on different study aspects was completed by the respondents. Setting: Data were collected in the European Food Consumption Validation Study. Subjects: A convenience sample of 600 apparently healthy men and women, 45–65 years old and including all educational levels, were recruited (120 subjects per country). Differences among population groups were compared by means of the ¿ 2-test. Results: A total of 585 respondents completed the evaluation questionnaire. In all, 88% experienced problems only to a low degree when answering face-to-face and telephone-administered 24-HDR using EPIC-Soft. A total of 15% would have preferred help of another person during the face-to-face interview in the study center (mainly men: P

KW - multiple-pass method

KW - validation

KW - children

KW - accuracy

KW - centers

U2 - 10.1038/ejcn.2011.85

DO - 10.1038/ejcn.2011.85

M3 - Article

SN - 0954-3007

VL - 65

SP - S29-S37

JO - European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

JF - European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

ER -

Respondents' evaluation of the 24-h dietary recall method (EPIC-Soft) in the EFCOVAL Project

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this