Abstract
A puzzling piece of empirical evidence suggests that resource-abundant
countries tend to grow slower than their resource-poor counterparts. We attempt to explain
this phenomenon by developing a lobbying game in which rent seeking firms interact with
corrupt governments. The presence or absence of political competition, as well as the
potential costs of political transitions, turn out to be key elements in generating the
`resource curse.¿ These variables define the degree of freedom that incumbent
governments have in pursuing development policies that maximize surplus in the lobbying
game, but put the economy off its optimal path. We test our predictions by adding
measures of democracy and authoritarianism to existing regression models of the resource
curse, and obtain support for our hypotheses
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 5 |
Journal | The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Keywords
- political-economy
- rent-seeking
- civil-war
- big push
- growth
- institutions
- allocation
- booms