Resilience Metrics for Socio-Ecological and Socio-Technical Systems: A Scoping Review

Patrick Steinmann*, Hilde Tobi, George A.K. van Voorn

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

An increased interest in the resilience of complex socio-ecological and socio-technical systems has led to a variety of metrics being proposed. An overview of these metrics and their underlying concepts would support identifying useful metrics for applications in science and engineering. This study undertakes a scoping review of resilience metrics for systems straddling the societal, ecological, and technical domains to determine how resilience has been measured, the conceptual differences between the proposed approaches, and how they align with the domains of their case studies. We find that a wide variety of resilience metrics have been proposed in the literature. Conceptually, ten different quantification approaches were identified. Four different disturbance types were observed, including sudden, continuous, multiple, and abruptly ending disturbances. Surprisingly, there is no strong pattern regarding socio-ecological systems being studied using the “ecological resilience” concept and socio-technical systems being studied using the “engineering resilience” concept. As a result, we recommend that researchers use multiple resilience metrics in the same study, ideally following different conceptual approaches, and compare the resulting insights. Furthermore, the used metrics should be mathematically defined, the included variables explained and their units provided, and the chosen functional form justified.

Original languageEnglish
Article number357
JournalSystems
Volume12
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2024

Keywords

  • metrics
  • resilience
  • scoping review
  • SES
  • STS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Resilience Metrics for Socio-Ecological and Socio-Technical Systems: A Scoping Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this