Residue analysis of tetracyclines in poultry muscle: Shortcomings revealed by a proficiency test

B.J.A. Berendsen, J.A. van Rhijn

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    18 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    A proficiency test for tetracycline drug residues in poultry muscle was organized according to the guidelines of International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) ILAC-G13:2000 (2000). For the proficiency test, three test materials were prepared. The homogeneity and stability of the materials during the study were demonstrated. Sixteen laboratories accepted the invitation to participate in the proficiency test; 11 laboratories reported results within the time frame of the study. Most notably, only four of the participating laboratories complied with the definition of the maximum residue limit (MRL) concerning the inclusion of 4-epimers as stated in European Commission Regulation 281/96 (1996). Most participants reported values for the decision limit (CC) and detection capability (CC) and hence were already in compliance with European Commission 2002/657/EC (2002) for this aspect of method validation. However, some CC and CC values were not in agreement with the actual within-laboratory reproducibility calculated from the results reported in this proficiency test. Although most laboratories obtained satisfactory results, it is clear that an effort is needed to include 4-epiOTC, 4-epiTC and 4-epiCTC in the analytical methods. Moreover, reconsideration of values determined for CC and CC with respect to their accuracy may be necessary in some cases
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1141-1148
    JournalFood Additives and Contaminants
    Volume23
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Keywords

    • Antibiotics
    • Proficiency test
    • Tetracyclines
    • Veterinary residues

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Residue analysis of tetracyclines in poultry muscle: Shortcomings revealed by a proficiency test'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this