Research Practices in Comparative Communication Research: Visibility, Topical and Geographical Disparities, and their Longitudinal Patterns

Fabienne Lind*, Hyunjin Song*, Hajo G. Boomgaarden*, Ahrabhi Kathirgamalingam*, Kim Pamina Syed Ali*, Rens Vliegenthart*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article provides a meta-research of comparative communication science articles published in 32 communication journals between 2003 and 2021. Relying on a combination of automated and manual content analysis, we find a gradual increase in the proportion of comparative studies throughout the 19-year span, although their overall presence remains limited. Through a longitudinal lens, we dissect evolving trends in themes, methodologies, studied cases, and authorship of comparative communication research, with political communication emerging as a prominent topic. We also identify a preference for quantitative methodologies over qualitative or mixed-method approaches. Assessing the geographic patterns of cases and authorship locations, our results echo previous meta-research studies by finding that comparative research is yet another subdiscipline with a strong dominance of Western countries. Discussing these findings, we highlight the critical need for future comparative communication research to foster global representation and inclusivity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1103-1128
Number of pages26
JournalInternational Journal of Communication
Volume19
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • communication science
  • comparative research
  • longitudinal patterns
  • meta-research
  • relative salience
  • topical and geographical disparities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Research Practices in Comparative Communication Research: Visibility, Topical and Geographical Disparities, and their Longitudinal Patterns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this