Research Overview, Gaps, and Recommendations

Calliope Panoutsou; Hans Langeveld; Uwe R. Fritsche; Berien Elbersen; Ilze Dzene; Rainer Janssen; Birger Kerckow; Dragoslava D. Stojiljkovic; Petar M. Gvero

doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-812303-4.00010-0

Research Overview, Gaps, and Recommendations

Calliope Panoutsou^*, Hans Langeveld, Uwe R. Fritsche, Berien Elbersen, Ilze Dzene, Rainer Janssen, Birger Kerckow, Dragoslava D. Stojiljkovic, Petar M. Gvero

^*Corresponding author for this work

Earth Observation and Environmental Informatics

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Modeling biomass supply and logistics has been included both directly and indirectly in European research and several initiatives have taken place through the last 15 years. Research has evolved from narrow assessments covering single or a few feedstock types and specific regions to harmonized approaches with consistent algorithms applied across Europe at different regional and temporal scales.The aim of this chapter is to provide an overview of research work in the area, identify gaps in research knowledge, and provide recommendations for future to research in the field of modeling biomass supply and logistics.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Supply Chains
Subtitle of host publication	Top-Down and Bottom-up Assessment for Agricultural, Forest and Waste Feedstock
Publisher	Elsevier
Pages	253-269
Number of pages	17
ISBN (Electronic)	9780128123041
ISBN (Print)	9780128123034
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812303-4.00010-0
Publication status	Published - 15 Aug 2017

Keywords

Assessments
Biomass supply
Future research
Modeling tools

Access to Document

10.1016/B978-0-12-812303-4.00010-0

Cite this

Panoutsou, C., Langeveld, H., Fritsche, U. R., Elbersen, B., Dzene, I., Janssen, R., Kerckow, B., Stojiljkovic, D. D., & Gvero, P. M. (2017). Research Overview, Gaps, and Recommendations. In Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Supply Chains: Top-Down and Bottom-up Assessment for Agricultural, Forest and Waste Feedstock (pp. 253-269). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812303-4.00010-0

@inbook{8fb2ce0a1618493db362778673ca0607,

title = "Research Overview, Gaps, and Recommendations",

abstract = "Modeling biomass supply and logistics has been included both directly and indirectly in European research and several initiatives have taken place through the last 15 years. Research has evolved from narrow assessments covering single or a few feedstock types and specific regions to harmonized approaches with consistent algorithms applied across Europe at different regional and temporal scales.The aim of this chapter is to provide an overview of research work in the area, identify gaps in research knowledge, and provide recommendations for future to research in the field of modeling biomass supply and logistics.",

keywords = "Assessments, Biomass supply, Future research, Modeling tools",

author = "Calliope Panoutsou and Hans Langeveld and Fritsche, {Uwe R.} and Berien Elbersen and Ilze Dzene and Rainer Janssen and Birger Kerckow and Stojiljkovic, {Dragoslava D.} and Gvero, {Petar M.}",

year = "2017",

month = aug,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1016/B978-0-12-812303-4.00010-0",

language = "English",

isbn = "9780128123034",

pages = "253--269",

booktitle = "Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Supply Chains",

publisher = "Elsevier",

address = "Netherlands",

}

Panoutsou, C, Langeveld, H, Fritsche, UR, Elbersen, B, Dzene, I, Janssen, R, Kerckow, B, Stojiljkovic, DD & Gvero, PM 2017, Research Overview, Gaps, and Recommendations. in Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Supply Chains: Top-Down and Bottom-up Assessment for Agricultural, Forest and Waste Feedstock. Elsevier, pp. 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812303-4.00010-0

Research Overview, Gaps, and Recommendations. / Panoutsou, Calliope; Langeveld, Hans; Fritsche, Uwe R. et al.
Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Supply Chains: Top-Down and Bottom-up Assessment for Agricultural, Forest and Waste Feedstock. Elsevier, 2017. p. 253-269.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic › peer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Research Overview, Gaps, and Recommendations

AU - Panoutsou, Calliope

AU - Langeveld, Hans

AU - Fritsche, Uwe R.

AU - Elbersen, Berien

AU - Dzene, Ilze

AU - Janssen, Rainer

AU - Kerckow, Birger

AU - Stojiljkovic, Dragoslava D.

AU - Gvero, Petar M.

PY - 2017/8/15

Y1 - 2017/8/15

N2 - Modeling biomass supply and logistics has been included both directly and indirectly in European research and several initiatives have taken place through the last 15 years. Research has evolved from narrow assessments covering single or a few feedstock types and specific regions to harmonized approaches with consistent algorithms applied across Europe at different regional and temporal scales.The aim of this chapter is to provide an overview of research work in the area, identify gaps in research knowledge, and provide recommendations for future to research in the field of modeling biomass supply and logistics.

AB - Modeling biomass supply and logistics has been included both directly and indirectly in European research and several initiatives have taken place through the last 15 years. Research has evolved from narrow assessments covering single or a few feedstock types and specific regions to harmonized approaches with consistent algorithms applied across Europe at different regional and temporal scales.The aim of this chapter is to provide an overview of research work in the area, identify gaps in research knowledge, and provide recommendations for future to research in the field of modeling biomass supply and logistics.

KW - Assessments

KW - Biomass supply

KW - Future research

KW - Modeling tools

U2 - 10.1016/B978-0-12-812303-4.00010-0

DO - 10.1016/B978-0-12-812303-4.00010-0

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780128123034

SP - 253

EP - 269

BT - Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Supply Chains

PB - Elsevier

ER -

Research Overview, Gaps, and Recommendations

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this