Research brief : Serving Bowl Selection Biases the Amount of Food Served

E. van Kleef, M. Shimizu, B. Wansink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine how common serving bowls containing food for multiple persons influence serving behavior and consumption and whether they do so independently of satiation and food evaluation. Methods: In this between-subjects experiment, 68 participants were randomly assigned to either a group serving pasta from a large-sized bowl (6.9-L capacity) or a medium-sized bowl (3.8-L capacity). Results: Analysis of covariance showed that when given a large-sized bowl, diners served 77% more pasta (364.0 versus 205.5 g; P <.01) and felt more satiated (P ¼ .03) compared with diners given a medium-sized bowl, even though the food was not rated tastier or otherwise notable (all P > .32). Conclusions and Implications: In contrast to those in studies involving larger-sized plates and spoons, people serving from larger bowls felt more satiated. These findings again highlight the role that external cues play in food consumption and show the importance of considering serving bowl size in nutrition education.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)66-70
JournalJournal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Selection Bias
Food
Research
Satiation
Cues
Education

Keywords

  • portion sizes
  • college-students
  • energy-intake
  • consumption
  • distortion
  • illusions
  • spoons
  • volume
  • impact
  • eaten

Cite this

@article{c3f59aa6e186419098f7d3c6222ced8c,
title = "Research brief : Serving Bowl Selection Biases the Amount of Food Served",
abstract = "Objective: To determine how common serving bowls containing food for multiple persons influence serving behavior and consumption and whether they do so independently of satiation and food evaluation. Methods: In this between-subjects experiment, 68 participants were randomly assigned to either a group serving pasta from a large-sized bowl (6.9-L capacity) or a medium-sized bowl (3.8-L capacity). Results: Analysis of covariance showed that when given a large-sized bowl, diners served 77{\%} more pasta (364.0 versus 205.5 g; P <.01) and felt more satiated (P ¼ .03) compared with diners given a medium-sized bowl, even though the food was not rated tastier or otherwise notable (all P > .32). Conclusions and Implications: In contrast to those in studies involving larger-sized plates and spoons, people serving from larger bowls felt more satiated. These findings again highlight the role that external cues play in food consumption and show the importance of considering serving bowl size in nutrition education.",
keywords = "portion sizes, college-students, energy-intake, consumption, distortion, illusions, spoons, volume, impact, eaten",
author = "{van Kleef}, E. and M. Shimizu and B. Wansink",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.jneb.2011.03.001",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "66--70",
journal = "Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior",
issn = "1499-4046",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Research brief : Serving Bowl Selection Biases the Amount of Food Served. / van Kleef, E.; Shimizu, M.; Wansink, B.

In: Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2012, p. 66-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research brief : Serving Bowl Selection Biases the Amount of Food Served

AU - van Kleef, E.

AU - Shimizu, M.

AU - Wansink, B.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Objective: To determine how common serving bowls containing food for multiple persons influence serving behavior and consumption and whether they do so independently of satiation and food evaluation. Methods: In this between-subjects experiment, 68 participants were randomly assigned to either a group serving pasta from a large-sized bowl (6.9-L capacity) or a medium-sized bowl (3.8-L capacity). Results: Analysis of covariance showed that when given a large-sized bowl, diners served 77% more pasta (364.0 versus 205.5 g; P <.01) and felt more satiated (P ¼ .03) compared with diners given a medium-sized bowl, even though the food was not rated tastier or otherwise notable (all P > .32). Conclusions and Implications: In contrast to those in studies involving larger-sized plates and spoons, people serving from larger bowls felt more satiated. These findings again highlight the role that external cues play in food consumption and show the importance of considering serving bowl size in nutrition education.

AB - Objective: To determine how common serving bowls containing food for multiple persons influence serving behavior and consumption and whether they do so independently of satiation and food evaluation. Methods: In this between-subjects experiment, 68 participants were randomly assigned to either a group serving pasta from a large-sized bowl (6.9-L capacity) or a medium-sized bowl (3.8-L capacity). Results: Analysis of covariance showed that when given a large-sized bowl, diners served 77% more pasta (364.0 versus 205.5 g; P <.01) and felt more satiated (P ¼ .03) compared with diners given a medium-sized bowl, even though the food was not rated tastier or otherwise notable (all P > .32). Conclusions and Implications: In contrast to those in studies involving larger-sized plates and spoons, people serving from larger bowls felt more satiated. These findings again highlight the role that external cues play in food consumption and show the importance of considering serving bowl size in nutrition education.

KW - portion sizes

KW - college-students

KW - energy-intake

KW - consumption

KW - distortion

KW - illusions

KW - spoons

KW - volume

KW - impact

KW - eaten

U2 - 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.03.001

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 66

EP - 70

JO - Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

JF - Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

SN - 1499-4046

IS - 1

ER -