Abstract
We analyze the interaction between regulatory policies and the financial structure of a fishery and show that firms with debts may respond differently to regulations than firms that have not accumulated debts. There are conditions where more stringent regulation is counterproductive, providing a perverse incentive to increase harvesting effort. We show that optimal regulation depends on the sector's financial structure, and demonstrate that there are cases when intervention is counterproductive, or too costly to implement. There are also cases where successful regulatory intervention can only be implemented when accompanied by a sufficiently large subsidy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 41-53 |
| Journal | Resource and Energy Economics |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2006 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Keywords
- irreversible investment
- fisheries
- enforcement
- management
- model
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Renewable Resource Regulation and Uncertain Prices: The Role of Financial Structure and Bankruptcy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver