Relative importance of competition and plant–soil feedback, their synergy, context dependency and implications for coexistence

Ylva Lekberg*, James D. Bever, Rebecca A. Bunn, Ragan M. Callaway, Miranda M. Hart, Stephanie N. Kivlin, John Klironomos, Beau G. Larkin, John L. Maron, Kurt O. Reinhart, Michael Remke, Wim H. van der Putten

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Plants interact simultaneously with each other and with soil biota, yet the relative importance of competition vs. plant–soil feedback (PSF) on plant performance is poorly understood. Using a meta-analysis of 38 published studies and 150 plant species, we show that effects of interspecific competition (either growing plants with a competitor or singly, or comparing inter- vs. intraspecific competition) and PSF (comparing home vs. away soil, live vs. sterile soil, or control vs. fungicide-treated soil) depended on treatments but were predominantly negative, broadly comparable in magnitude, and additive or synergistic. Stronger competitors experienced more negative PSF than weaker competitors when controlling for density (inter- to intraspecific competition), suggesting that PSF could prevent competitive dominance and promote coexistence. When competition was measured against plants growing singly, the strength of competition overwhelmed PSF, indicating that the relative importance of PSF may depend not only on neighbour identity but also density. We evaluate how competition and PSFs might interact across resource gradients; PSF will likely strengthen competitive interactions in high resource environments and enhance facilitative interactions in low-resource environments. Finally, we provide a framework for filling key knowledge gaps and advancing our understanding of how these biotic interactions influence community structure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1268-1281
JournalEcology Letters
Volume21
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018

Keywords

  • Additive interaction
  • coexistence
  • competition
  • facilitation
  • meta-analysis
  • mutualist
  • pathogen
  • plant–soil feedback
  • resource gradient
  • soil biota

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Relative importance of competition and plant–soil feedback, their synergy, context dependency and implications for coexistence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Datasets

    Data from: Relative importance of competition and plant-soil feedback, their synergy, context dependency and implications for coexistence

    Lekberg, Y. (Creator), Bever, J. D. (Creator), Bunn, R. A. (Creator), Callaway, R. M. (Creator), Hart, M. M. (Creator), Kivlin, S. N. (Creator), Klironomos, J. (Creator), Larkin, B. G. (Creator), Maron, J. L. (Creator), Reinhart, K. O. (Creator), Remke, M. (Creator) & van der Putten, W. (Creator), May 2019

    Dataset

    Cite this

    Lekberg, Y., Bever, J. D., Bunn, R. A., Callaway, R. M., Hart, M. M., Kivlin, S. N., Klironomos, J., Larkin, B. G., Maron, J. L., Reinhart, K. O., Remke, M., & van der Putten, W. H. (2018). Relative importance of competition and plant–soil feedback, their synergy, context dependency and implications for coexistence. Ecology Letters, 21(8), 1268-1281. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13093