Regulatory Validity

K. Purnhagen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Behavioural forms of regulation, e.g. nudging and debiasing , increasingly take centre stage in regulatory agendas and are making their way into EU consumer law. In order to warrant for an effective implementation, findings from behavioural sciences need to conform with the regulatory context conditions of the underlying legal system and need to be fit for purpose to answer questions the law asks. Behavioural studies hence need to pass a regulatory validity test before they can be operationalised in the law. I will explain how such a regulatory validity test can work in EU consumer law. I will first illustrate the different context conditions of behavioural sciences on the one hand and of law on the other (I.). Subsequently, I will illustrate these differences on the example of a comparison of the recently commissioned behavioural science study by the European Commission on the “vulnerable consumer” and the legal requirements of the “average consumer” benchmark (II.). To overcome the shortfalls this example illustrates, I will introduce a regulatory validity test which can be applied by behavioural and legal scientist, courts, and regulators (III.). I will then conclude the findings (IV.).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearch Methods in Consumer Law
Subtitle of host publicationA Handbook
EditorsHans-W. Micklitz, Anne-Lise Sibony, Fabrizio Esposito
PublisherEdward Elgar
Chapter8
Pages276-295
ISBN (Electronic)9781785366611
ISBN (Print)9781785366604
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Dec 2018

Publication series

NameHandbooks of Research Methods in Law
PublisherEdward Elgar

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Regulatory Validity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this