Reframing Tri Hita Karana: From ‘Balinese Culture’ to Politics

D. Roth, G. Sedana

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article takes issue with the uncritical way in which claims of ‘culture’, ‘tradition’ or ‘local knowledge’ are used in science and policymaking around the Balinese irrigators' association (subak). The growing problems of Balinese irrigated agriculture are increasingly framed in ‘cultural’ ways that are not neutral: such accounts of irrigated agriculture in relation to Balinese culture deeply influence the world of policymaking. In this article we discuss the emergence of Tri Hita Karana (THK; ‘the three causes of well-being’) as an ideology, scientific concept and policy concept in irrigated agriculture and the subak domain. We argue that this ideological concept is not simply ‘local wisdom’, ‘tradition’ or ‘culture’ but requires critical scientific scrutiny as part of wider processes of socio-political change. How is it mobilised? What does its growing popularity mean for our knowledge of Balinese irrigated agriculture, of policy processes directed at the subak and of the workings of policies in real-life contexts?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)157-175
JournalThe Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

agriculture
politics
political change
wisdom
popularity
ideology
well-being
cause
science

Keywords

  • agama
  • irrigation
  • management
  • adat

Cite this

@article{3127a1527fe4425d8a3d098a31ac70d2,
title = "Reframing Tri Hita Karana: From ‘Balinese Culture’ to Politics",
abstract = "This article takes issue with the uncritical way in which claims of ‘culture’, ‘tradition’ or ‘local knowledge’ are used in science and policymaking around the Balinese irrigators' association (subak). The growing problems of Balinese irrigated agriculture are increasingly framed in ‘cultural’ ways that are not neutral: such accounts of irrigated agriculture in relation to Balinese culture deeply influence the world of policymaking. In this article we discuss the emergence of Tri Hita Karana (THK; ‘the three causes of well-being’) as an ideology, scientific concept and policy concept in irrigated agriculture and the subak domain. We argue that this ideological concept is not simply ‘local wisdom’, ‘tradition’ or ‘culture’ but requires critical scientific scrutiny as part of wider processes of socio-political change. How is it mobilised? What does its growing popularity mean for our knowledge of Balinese irrigated agriculture, of policy processes directed at the subak and of the workings of policies in real-life contexts?",
keywords = "agama, irrigation, management, adat",
author = "D. Roth and G. Sedana",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/14442213.2014.994674",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "157--175",
journal = "The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology",
issn = "1444-2213",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

Reframing Tri Hita Karana: From ‘Balinese Culture’ to Politics. / Roth, D.; Sedana, G.

In: The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2015, p. 157-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reframing Tri Hita Karana: From ‘Balinese Culture’ to Politics

AU - Roth, D.

AU - Sedana, G.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This article takes issue with the uncritical way in which claims of ‘culture’, ‘tradition’ or ‘local knowledge’ are used in science and policymaking around the Balinese irrigators' association (subak). The growing problems of Balinese irrigated agriculture are increasingly framed in ‘cultural’ ways that are not neutral: such accounts of irrigated agriculture in relation to Balinese culture deeply influence the world of policymaking. In this article we discuss the emergence of Tri Hita Karana (THK; ‘the three causes of well-being’) as an ideology, scientific concept and policy concept in irrigated agriculture and the subak domain. We argue that this ideological concept is not simply ‘local wisdom’, ‘tradition’ or ‘culture’ but requires critical scientific scrutiny as part of wider processes of socio-political change. How is it mobilised? What does its growing popularity mean for our knowledge of Balinese irrigated agriculture, of policy processes directed at the subak and of the workings of policies in real-life contexts?

AB - This article takes issue with the uncritical way in which claims of ‘culture’, ‘tradition’ or ‘local knowledge’ are used in science and policymaking around the Balinese irrigators' association (subak). The growing problems of Balinese irrigated agriculture are increasingly framed in ‘cultural’ ways that are not neutral: such accounts of irrigated agriculture in relation to Balinese culture deeply influence the world of policymaking. In this article we discuss the emergence of Tri Hita Karana (THK; ‘the three causes of well-being’) as an ideology, scientific concept and policy concept in irrigated agriculture and the subak domain. We argue that this ideological concept is not simply ‘local wisdom’, ‘tradition’ or ‘culture’ but requires critical scientific scrutiny as part of wider processes of socio-political change. How is it mobilised? What does its growing popularity mean for our knowledge of Balinese irrigated agriculture, of policy processes directed at the subak and of the workings of policies in real-life contexts?

KW - agama

KW - irrigation

KW - management

KW - adat

U2 - 10.1080/14442213.2014.994674

DO - 10.1080/14442213.2014.994674

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 157

EP - 175

JO - The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology

JF - The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology

SN - 1444-2213

IS - 2

ER -