Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reflections for Biodiversity Researchers Engaging With Policy‐Science Interfaces

  • Ana Carnaval*
  • , Debra Zuppinger‐Dingley
  • , Andrea Paz
  • , Maria J. Santos
  • , Andrew Berger
  • , Vinicius Marcilio‐Silva
  • , Márcia C.M. Marques
  • , Maximilian Tschol
  • , Adina Arth
  • , Francesca Rosa
  • , Catalina Pimiento
  • , Eric Mijts
  • , Lynne Shannon
  • , Sylvia Karlsson‐Vinkhuyzen
  • , Melanie Paschke
  • , Jean Krasno
  • , Eva M. Spehn
  • , Rémi Willemin
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Researchers who wish to engage in policy processes to help address the biodiversity crisis are often hindered by fear of the potential drawbacks to doing so. The complexity of political systems, the necessity to interact with policymakers or politicians outside of the work environment, the potential professional risks that may arise from engagement, advocacy, or activism, and the lack of institutional recognition and support for engaging in the science–policy interface may be daunting. Following the negotiation and adoption of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, a reflection on how biodiversity researchers may engage more in policy processes is timely. Here, we introduce and reflect on some of the tools that can empower researchers who would like to engage in (1) changing policies, (2) multidirectional communication, (3) building networks, (4) activism and advocacy, and (5) securing institutional support.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70049
JournalBulletin of the Ecological Society of America
Volume107
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reflections for Biodiversity Researchers Engaging With Policy‐Science Interfaces'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this