TY - JOUR
T1 - Reduction of nitrogen pollution in agriculture through nitrogen surplus quotas
T2 - an analysis of individual marginal abatement cost and different quota allocation schemes using an agent-based model
AU - Schmidt, Alena
AU - Mack, Gabriele
AU - Mann, Stefan
AU - Six, Johan
PY - 2021/7/3
Y1 - 2021/7/3
N2 - Nitrogen (N) pollution has mostly been controlled using command-and-control instruments. However, nitrogen surplus permits (NSPs), which are tradeable, can be more cost-efficient in addressing the problem. To model this instrument, we calculated the individual marginal abatement cost curve for a sample of about 3,400 Swiss farms using farm-optimization models implemented in the agent-based agricultural sector model SWISSland. We also used SWISSland to analyze the effects of two NSP distribution systems (grandfathering and land-based allocation) on different farm types. The results showed that different farm types range in their abatement costs to reduce N surplus from an average of −0.04 CHF kg−1 N on arable farms to 51.06 CHF kg−1 N on special crop farms. We also found that N surpluses hardly explain the level of abatement costs. The biggest differences in effects of the distribution scheme were found in intensive livestock farm types such as pig or poultry farms.
AB - Nitrogen (N) pollution has mostly been controlled using command-and-control instruments. However, nitrogen surplus permits (NSPs), which are tradeable, can be more cost-efficient in addressing the problem. To model this instrument, we calculated the individual marginal abatement cost curve for a sample of about 3,400 Swiss farms using farm-optimization models implemented in the agent-based agricultural sector model SWISSland. We also used SWISSland to analyze the effects of two NSP distribution systems (grandfathering and land-based allocation) on different farm types. The results showed that different farm types range in their abatement costs to reduce N surplus from an average of −0.04 CHF kg−1 N on arable farms to 51.06 CHF kg−1 N on special crop farms. We also found that N surpluses hardly explain the level of abatement costs. The biggest differences in effects of the distribution scheme were found in intensive livestock farm types such as pig or poultry farms.
KW - agent-based modeling
KW - marginal abatement cost (MAC)
KW - N surplus
KW - permit
KW - Switzerland
UR - https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13214541
U2 - 10.1080/09640568.2020.1823344
DO - 10.1080/09640568.2020.1823344
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85096129242
SN - 0964-0568
VL - 64
SP - 1375
EP - 1391
JO - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
IS - 8
ER -