Recreational ecosystem services in European cities: Sociocultural and geographical contexts matter for park use

L.K. Fischer*, J. Honold, A. Botzat, D. Brinkmeyer, R. Cvejic, T. Delshammar, B.H.M. Elands, D. Haase, Nadja Kabisch, S.J. Karle

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The role of urban parks in delivering cultural ecosystem services related to outdoor recreation is widely acknowledged. Yet, the question remains as to whether the recreational opportunities of parks meet the demands of increasingly multicultural societies and whether recreational patterns vary at spatial scales. In a pan-European survey, we assessed how people use urban parks (in five cities, N = 3814) and how recreational patterns relate to respondents’ sociocultural and geographical contexts (using 19 explanatory
variables). Our results show that across Europe (i) respondents share a general pattern in their recreational activities with a prevalence for the physical uses of parks, especially taking a walk; (ii) the geographic context matters, demonstrating a high variety of uses across the cities; and that (iii) the sociocultural context is also important; e.g., the occupation and biodiversity valuations of respondents are significantly associated with the uses performed. The sociocultural context matters particularly for physical park uses and is associated to a lesser extent with nature-related uses. Given that our results attest to a high variety of park uses between sociocultural groups and the geographical context, we conclude that it is important to consider the specific backgrounds of people to enhance recreational ecosystem services in
greenspace development.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)455-467
JournalEcosystem Services
Volume31
Early online date10 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Recreational ecosystem services in European cities: Sociocultural and geographical contexts matter for park use'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this